Scores updated for 2026!

Pacific Union Elementary

Fresno County school performance

Summary

Pacific Union Elementary is badly underperforming.

Reading and math results average to the 43rd percentile among California school districts.

Only 37.3% of students met California's reading standard, and it is slowly trending down.Trending down

Math is weaker: 33.8% of students met California's math standard, but it is trending up slightly.Trending up

Proficiency Stats
Current Reading Proficiency37.3%
Current Math Proficiency33.8%
District Reading Rank657 / 977 (33rd percentile)
District Math Rank449 / 977 (54th percentile)
Other Stats
Student / Teacher Ratio16:1
Spend per Student$23,524
Schools in District1
Student Enrollment328
Low-Income Students295 (89.9%)
English Learners180 (54.9%)

Test score trends

2024 - 2026

Reading fell 0.1 points from last year and fell 4.1 points over the full period. Math fell 5.2 points from last year and rose 0.9 points over the full period.

Reading -4.1 percentage pointsTrend down•Math +0.9 percentage pointsTrend up
Changes shown: Reading 2024–2026; Math 2024–2026.

Board Members

nameelectedup for re-election

Susan Markarian

President

N/AN/A

Paul Jaurigue

Clerk

N/AN/A

Barbara Petersen

Member

N/AN/A

Rachell Mendez

Member

N/AN/A

Valerie Holmes

Member

N/AN/A

Board website

Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance

Reading Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 28.2 points in reading. It widened over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income -4.9 percentage pointsTrend down•
Non-Low-Income +4.3 percentage pointsTrend up

English Learners vs English Native

12.9% of English learners meet the reading standard, compared with 45.0% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results fell and English-only results fell.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners -7.9 percentage pointsTrend down•
English Native -3.7 percentage pointsTrend down

Math Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 32.1 points in math. It widened over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income -1.8 percentage pointsTrend down•
Non-Low-Income +29.8 percentage pointsTrend up

English Learners vs English Native

12.9% of English learners meet the math standard, compared with 40.0% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results fell and English-only results fell.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners -9.9 percentage pointsTrend down•
English Native -1.0 percentage pointsTrend down

District School Map

Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.

Loading district map...

Hover over a school marker to see details

Schools

Understanding this district

How does Pacific Union Elementary rank in California?

Pacific Union Elementary ranks No. 657 of 977 in reading and No. 449 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.

How do low-income students in Pacific Union Elementary compare with other districts?

Low-income reading proficiency is 35.0%, compared with 37.6% at a typical California elementary district. In math, it is 31.1%, compared with 28.2%.

See student-group results

Which districts should I compare with Pacific Union Elementary?

Elementary districts in Fresno County. Peers have the closest enrollment sizes.

2026 proficiency
DistrictMathReading
Pacific Union ElementaryThis district33.8%37.3%
Washington Colony Elementary27.4%46.4%
Clay Joint Elementary80.2%81.4%
Compare these districts
How we compare low-income results

“Typical” is the median across 444 California elementary districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.