Scores updated for 2026!

Monson-Sultana Joint Union Elementary

Tulare County school performance

Summary

Monson-Sultana Joint Union Elementary is badly underperforming.

Reading and math results average to the 52nd percentile among California school districts.

Only 39.9% of students met California's reading standard, but it is slowly trending up.Trending up

Math is weaker: 39.3% of students met California's math standard, and it is trending down slightly.Trending down

Proficiency Stats
Current Reading Proficiency39.9%
Current Math Proficiency39.3%
District Reading Rank595 / 977 (39th percentile)
District Math Rank346 / 977 (65th percentile)
Other Stats
Student / Teacher Ratio21:1
Spend per Student$18,366
Schools in District1
Student Enrollment440
Low-Income Students386 (87.7%)
English Learners160 (36.4%)

Test score trends

2024 - 2026

Reading rose 2.0 points from last year and rose 3.1 points over the full period. Math fell 3.5 points from last year and fell 2.3 points over the full period.

Reading +3.1 percentage pointsTrend up•Math -2.3 percentage pointsTrend down
Changes shown: Reading 2024–2026; Math 2024–2026.

Board Members

nameelectedup for re-election

Vicki Worthley

Board President

N/A2026This year!

Lynn Simmons

Clerk

N/A2026This year!

Annie L. Davidian

Member

20242028

Delbert Quintana

Member

N/A2026This year!

Roy Valdez

Member

20242028

Board website

Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance

Reading Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 32.3 points in reading. It widened over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income +2.6 percentage pointsTrend up•
Non-Low-Income +12.0 percentage pointsTrend up

English Learners vs English Native

17.0% of English learners meet the reading standard, compared with 46.7% of English-only students. The gap narrowed as English-learner results rose and English-only results fell.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners +3.7 percentage pointsTrend up•
English Native -1.1 percentage pointsTrend down

Math Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 22.5 points in math. It widened over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income -2.5 percentage pointsTrend down•
Non-Low-Income +2.6 percentage pointsTrend up

English Learners vs English Native

21.3% of English learners meet the math standard, compared with 44.0% of English-only students. The gap narrowed as English-learner results fell and English-only results fell.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners -2.6 percentage pointsTrend down•
English Native -3.0 percentage pointsTrend down

District School Map

Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.

Loading district map...

Hover over a school marker to see details

Schools

Understanding this district

How does Monson-Sultana Joint Union Elementary rank in California?

Monson-Sultana Joint Union Elementary ranks No. 595 of 977 in reading and No. 346 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.

How do low-income students in Monson-Sultana Joint Union Elementary compare with other districts?

Low-income reading proficiency is 36.4%, compared with 37.6% at a typical California elementary district. In math, it is 36.9%, compared with 28.2%.

See student-group results

Which districts should I compare with Monson-Sultana Joint Union Elementary?

Elementary districts in Tulare County. Peers have the closest enrollment sizes.

2026 proficiency
DistrictMathReading
Monson-Sultana Joint Union ElementaryThis district39.3%39.9%
Pleasant View Elementary13.8%24.4%
Richgrove Elementary17.4%25.0%
Compare these districts
How we compare low-income results

“Typical” is the median across 444 California elementary districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.