Scores updated for 2026!

Merced River Union Elementary

Merced County school performance

Summary

Merced River Union Elementary is badly underperforming.

Reading and math results average to the 45th percentile among California school districts.

Only 37.6% of students met California's reading standard, and it is slowly trending down.Trending down

Math is weaker: 35.6% of students met California's math standard, and it is trending down slightly.Trending down

Proficiency Stats
Current Reading Proficiency37.6%
Current Math Proficiency35.6%
District Reading Rank651 / 977 (33rd percentile)
District Math Rank416 / 977 (58th percentile)
Other Stats
Student / Teacher Ratio23:1
Spend per Student$15,990
Schools in District1
Student Enrollment295
Low-Income Students235 (79.7%)
English Learners52 (17.6%)

Test score trends

2024 - 2026

Reading fell 0.8 points from last year and fell 4.7 points over the full period. Math rose 1.3 points from last year and fell 1.7 points over the full period.

Reading -4.7 percentage pointsTrend down•Math -1.7 percentage pointsTrend down
Changes shown: Reading 2024–2026; Math 2024–2026.

Board Members

nameelectedup for re-election

Holly Tucker

School Board President

N/A2026This year!

John R. Sexauer

School Board President

N/A2028

Roxanne Rosales

Clerk

N/A2028

Ayerim Aguilar

Trustee

N/A2026This year!

Stephanie Sexauer

Trustee

N/A2028

Board website

Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance

Reading Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 7.9 points in reading. It narrowed over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income -5.1 percentage pointsTrend down•
Non-Low-Income -8.5 percentage pointsTrend down

English Learners vs English Native

8.1% of English learners meet the reading standard, compared with 41.9% of English-only students. The gap narrowed as English-learner results fell and English-only results fell.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners -1.3 percentage pointsTrend down•
English Native -4.5 percentage pointsTrend down

Math Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 8.2 points in math. It narrowed over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income -1.6 percentage pointsTrend down•
Non-Low-Income -8.5 percentage pointsTrend down

English Learners vs English Native

13.5% of English learners meet the math standard, compared with 44.4% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results fell and English-only results rose.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners -2.1 percentage pointsTrend down•
English Native +0.5 percentage pointsTrend up

District School Map

Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.

Loading district map...

Hover over a school marker to see details

Schools

Understanding this district

How does Merced River Union Elementary rank in California?

Merced River Union Elementary ranks No. 651 of 977 in reading and No. 416 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.

How do low-income students in Merced River Union Elementary compare with other districts?

Low-income reading proficiency is 35.5%, compared with 37.6% at a typical California elementary district. In math, it is 33.3%, compared with 28.2%.

See student-group results

Which districts should I compare with Merced River Union Elementary?

Elementary districts in Merced County. Peers have the closest enrollment sizes.

2026 proficiency
DistrictMathReading
Merced River Union ElementaryThis district35.6%37.6%
Ballico-Cressey Elementary33.2%40.6%
Le Grand Union Elementary27.4%44.1%
Compare these districts
How we compare low-income results

“Typical” is the median across 444 California elementary districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.