Scores updated for 2026!

Ballico-Cressey Elementary

Merced County school performance

Summary

Ballico-Cressey Elementary is underperforming.

Reading and math results average to the 47th percentile among California school districts.

Only 40.6% of students met California's reading standard, but it is holding steady.

Math is weaker: 33.2% of students met California's math standard, but it is slowly trending up.Trending up

Proficiency Stats
Current Reading Proficiency40.6%
Current Math Proficiency33.2%
District Reading Rank580 / 977 (41st percentile)
District Math Rank458 / 977 (53rd percentile)
Other Stats
Student / Teacher Ratio16:1
Spend per Student$33,049
Schools in District1
Student Enrollment336
Low-Income Students20 (46.5%)
English Learners9 (20.9%)

Test score trends

2024 - 2026

Reading fell 5.4 points from last year and fell 0.4 points over the full period. Math fell 3.4 points from last year and rose 3.9 points over the full period.

Reading -0.4 percentage pointsTrend down•Math +3.9 percentage pointsTrend up
Changes shown: Reading 2024–2026; Math 2024–2026.

Board Members

nameelectedup for re-election

Alvaro Arias

Board Member

20222026This year!

Eric Harcksen

Board Member

20222026This year!

James Ohki

Board Member

N/AN/A

Josh Brewer

Board Member

N/AN/A

Kalli Spycher

Board Member

20222026This year!

Board website

Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance

Reading Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 35.5 points in reading. It widened over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income -1.7 percentage pointsTrend down•
Non-Low-Income +16.9 percentage pointsTrend up

English Learners vs English Native

2.9% of English learners meet the reading standard, compared with 47.3% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results fell and English-only results fell.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners -24.9 percentage pointsTrend down•
English Native -1.2 percentage pointsTrend down

Math Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 33.9 points in math. It widened over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income -1.9 percentage pointsTrend down•
Non-Low-Income +26.3 percentage pointsTrend up

English Learners vs English Native

5.7% of English learners meet the math standard, compared with 39.3% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results fell and English-only results rose.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners -14.0 percentage pointsTrend down•
English Native +1.2 percentage pointsTrend up

District School Map

Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.

Loading district map...

Hover over a school marker to see details

Schools

Understanding this district

How does Ballico-Cressey Elementary rank in California?

Ballico-Cressey Elementary ranks No. 580 of 977 in reading and No. 458 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.

How do low-income students in Ballico-Cressey Elementary compare with other districts?

Low-income reading proficiency is 31.9%, compared with 37.6% at a typical California elementary district. In math, it is 24.8%, compared with 28.2%.

See student-group results

Which districts should I compare with Ballico-Cressey Elementary?

Elementary districts in Merced County. Peers have the closest enrollment sizes.

2026 proficiency
DistrictMathReading
Ballico-Cressey ElementaryThis district33.2%40.6%
Le Grand Union Elementary27.4%44.1%
Merced River Union Elementary35.6%37.6%
Compare these districts
How we compare low-income results

“Typical” is the median across 444 California elementary districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.