Scores updated for 2026!

McSwain Union Elementary

Merced County school performance

Summary

McSwain Union Elementary is underperforming.

Reading and math results average to the 63rd percentile among California school districts.

50.1% of students met California's reading standard, but it is trending down slightly.Trending down

Math is weaker: 37.8% of students met California's math standard, but it is trending up slightly.Trending up

Proficiency Stats
Current Reading Proficiency50.1%
Current Math Proficiency37.8%
District Reading Rank369 / 977 (62nd percentile)
District Math Rank365 / 977 (63rd percentile)
Other Stats
Student / Teacher Ratio21:1
Spend per Student$13,835
Schools in District1
Student Enrollment912
Low-Income Students339 (37.3%)
English Learners82 (9.0%)

Test score trends

2024 - 2026

Reading fell 2.3 points from last year and fell 1.7 points over the full period. Math rose 1.3 points from last year and rose 2.3 points over the full period.

Reading -1.7 percentage pointsTrend down•Math +2.3 percentage pointsTrend up
Changes shown: Reading 2024–2026; Math 2024–2026.

Board Members

nameelectedup for re-election

Scott Roduner

Board President

20222026This year!

Cindy Bell

Board Clerk

20222026This year!

Bill Halpin

Board of Trustee

19932026This year!

Joe Hoffar

Board of Trustee

20242028

Joe Scoto

Board of Trustee

20012028

Board website

Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance

Reading Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 12.8 points in reading. It narrowed slightly over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income -2.1 percentage pointsTrend down•
Non-Low-Income -3.8 percentage pointsTrend down

English Learners vs English Native

16.0% of English learners meet the reading standard, compared with 50.6% of English-only students. The gap narrowed as English-learner results rose and English-only results fell.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners +7.3 percentage pointsTrend up•
English Native -4.3 percentage pointsTrend down

Math Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 13.9 points in math. It widened slightly over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income -0.1 percentage pointsTrend down•
Non-Low-Income +1.9 percentage pointsTrend up

English Learners vs English Native

10.0% of English learners meet the math standard, compared with 39.6% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results fell and English-only results rose.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners -0.9 percentage pointsTrend down•
English Native +0.7 percentage pointsTrend up

District School Map

Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.

Loading district map...

Hover over a school marker to see details

Schools

Understanding this district

How does McSwain Union Elementary rank in California?

McSwain Union Elementary ranks No. 369 of 977 in reading and No. 365 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.

How do low-income students in McSwain Union Elementary compare with other districts?

Low-income reading proficiency is 42.1%, compared with 37.6% at a typical California elementary district. In math, it is 29.2%, compared with 28.2%.

See student-group results

Which districts should I compare with McSwain Union Elementary?

Elementary districts in Merced County. Peers have the closest enrollment sizes.

2026 proficiency
DistrictMathReading
McSwain Union ElementaryThis district37.8%50.1%
Planada Elementary27.4%41.5%
Winton37.8%47.4%
Compare these districts
How we compare low-income results

“Typical” is the median across 444 California elementary districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.