Scores updated for 2026!

Le Grand Union High

Merced County school performance

Summary

Le Grand Union High is underperforming.

Reading and math results average to the 42nd percentile among California school districts.

Only 44.4% of students met California's reading standard, but it is trending up slightly.Trending up

Math is weaker: 25.4% of students met California's math standard, but it is quickly trending up.Trending up

Proficiency Stats
Current Reading Proficiency44.4%
Current Math Proficiency25.4%
District Reading Rank502 / 977 (49th percentile)
District Math Rank631 / 977 (36th percentile)
Other Stats
Student / Teacher Ratio18:1
Spend per Student$24,909
Schools in District2
Student Enrollment504
Low-Income Students442 (87.7%)
English Learners122 (24.2%)

Test score trends

2024 - 2026

Reading fell 3.8 points from last year and rose 1.1 points over the full period. Math rose 6.9 points from last year and rose 12.0 points over the full period.

Reading +1.1 percentage pointsTrend up•Math +12.0 percentage pointsTrend up
Changes shown: Reading 2024–2026; Math 2024–2026.

Board Members

nameelectedup for re-election

Jeanne Giampaoli

President

20242028

Rich Jacobsen

Clerk

20222026This year!

Aide Marchini

Board Member

20222026This year!

Luciana Chavez

Board Member

20242028

Moses Mix

Board Member

N/AN/A

Board website

Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance

Reading Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Results for both income groups are unavailable, so a current reading gap cannot be calculated.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income +0.4 percentage pointsTrend up•
Non-Low-Income N/A

English Learners vs English Native

0.0% of English learners meet the reading standard, compared with 48.3% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results fell and English-only results fell.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners -14.3 percentage pointsTrend down•
English Native -9.8 percentage pointsTrend down

Math Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Results for both income groups are unavailable, so a current math gap cannot be calculated.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income +11.8 percentage pointsTrend up•
Non-Low-Income N/A

English Learners vs English Native

0.0% of English learners meet the math standard, compared with 20.7% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results fell and English-only results rose.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners -2.9 percentage pointsTrend down•
English Native +7.8 percentage pointsTrend up

District School Map

Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.

Loading district map...

Hover over a school marker to see details

Schools

Understanding this district

How does Le Grand Union High rank in California?

Le Grand Union High ranks No. 502 of 977 in reading and No. 631 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.

Are results improving across Le Grand Union High’s schools?

Over 2024–2026, reading proficiency rose at 0 of 2 schools with results covering that full period; math rose at 1 of 2.

Compare school trends

How do low-income students in Le Grand Union High compare with other districts?

Low-income reading proficiency is 44.4%, compared with 45.3% at a typical California high district. In math, it is 25.4%, compared with 19.5%.

See student-group results

Which districts should I compare with Le Grand Union High?

High districts in Merced County. Peers have the closest enrollment sizes.

2026 proficiency
DistrictMathReading
Le Grand Union HighThis district25.4%44.4%
Merced Union High15.8%42.0%
Compare these districts
How we compare low-income results

“Typical” is the median across 74 California high districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.