Scores updated for 2026!

Union Hill Elementary

Nevada County school performance

Summary

Union Hill Elementary is underperforming.

Reading and math results average to the 56th percentile among California school districts.

Only 43.0% of students met California's reading standard, and it is slowly trending down.Trending down

Math is weaker: 40.1% of students met California's math standard, and it is trending down slightly.Trending down

Proficiency Stats
Current Reading Proficiency43.0%
Current Math Proficiency40.1%
District Reading Rank527 / 977 (46th percentile)
District Math Rank327 / 977 (67th percentile)
Other Stats
Student / Teacher Ratio19:1
Spend per Student$15,863
Schools in District2
Student Enrollment688
Low-Income Students53 (36.3%)
English Learners0 (0.0%)

Test score trends

2024 - 2026

Reading fell 2.1 points from last year and fell 4.3 points over the full period. Math rose 3.3 points from last year and fell 1.5 points over the full period.

Reading -4.3 percentage pointsTrend down•Math -1.5 percentage pointsTrend down
Changes shown: Reading 2024–2026; Math 2024–2026.

Board Members

nameelectedup for re-election

John Schies

Board Member

N/AN/A

Leslie Lattyak

Board Member

N/AN/A

Mike Blake

Board Member

N/AN/A

Naomi Schmitt

Board Member

N/AN/A

Tami Stedman

Board Member

N/AN/A

Board website

Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance

Reading Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 25.1 points in reading. It widened over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income -10.3 percentage pointsTrend down•
Non-Low-Income -3.0 percentage pointsTrend down

English Learners vs English Native

Results for both language groups are unavailable, so a current reading gap cannot be calculated.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners N/A•
English Native -5.8 percentage pointsTrend down

Math Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 21.5 points in math. It widened over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income -6.9 percentage pointsTrend down•
Non-Low-Income -0.2 percentage pointsTrend down

English Learners vs English Native

Results for both language groups are unavailable, so a current math gap cannot be calculated.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners N/A•
English Native -2.3 percentage pointsTrend down

District School Map

Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.

Loading district map...

Hover over a school marker to see details

Schools

Understanding this district

How does Union Hill Elementary rank in California?

Union Hill Elementary ranks No. 527 of 977 in reading and No. 327 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.

Are results improving across Union Hill Elementary’s schools?

Over 2024–2026, reading proficiency rose at 0 of 2 schools with results covering that full period; math rose at 1 of 2.

Compare school trends

How do low-income students in Union Hill Elementary compare with other districts?

Low-income reading proficiency is 29.0%, compared with 37.6% at a typical California elementary district. In math, it is 28.1%, compared with 28.2%.

See student-group results

Which districts should I compare with Union Hill Elementary?

Elementary districts in Nevada County. Peers have the closest enrollment sizes.

2026 proficiency
DistrictMathReading
Union Hill ElementaryThis district40.1%43.0%
Nevada City Elementary43.9%60.0%
Penn Valley Union Elementary26.7%44.9%
Compare these districts
How we compare low-income results

“Typical” is the median across 444 California elementary districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.