Scores updated for 2026!

Trinity Alps Unified

Trinity County school performance

Summary

Trinity Alps Unified is underperforming.

Reading and math results average to the 50th percentile among California school districts.

Only 43.7% of students met California's reading standard, but it is slowly trending up.Trending up

Math is weaker: 32.6% of students met California's math standard, but it is slowly trending up.Trending up

Proficiency Stats
Current Reading Proficiency43.7%
Current Math Proficiency32.6%
District Reading Rank512 / 977 (48th percentile)
District Math Rank467 / 977 (52nd percentile)
Other Stats
Student / Teacher Ratio17:1
Spend per Student$19,875
Schools in District2
Student Enrollment643
Low-Income Students415 (64.8%)
English Learners8 (1.3%)

Test score trends

2024 - 2026

Reading fell 3.6 points from last year and rose 3.4 points over the full period. Math fell 0.7 points from last year and rose 3.8 points over the full period.

Reading +3.4 percentage pointsTrend up•Math +3.8 percentage pointsTrend up
Changes shown: Reading 2024–2026; Math 2024–2026.

Board Members

nameelectedup for re-election

Lynne Gervasi

President

[email protected]
N/AN/A

Nate Trujillo

Vice President/Clerk

[email protected]
N/AN/A

Ryan DeMoss

Board Member

[email protected]
N/AN/A

Samantha West

Board Member

[email protected]
N/AN/A

Zachery Sullivan

Board Member

[email protected]
N/AN/A

Board website

Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance

Reading Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 14.2 points in reading. It widened over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income -1.1 percentage pointsTrend down•
Non-Low-Income +7.5 percentage pointsTrend up

English Learners vs English Native

Results for both language groups are unavailable, so a current reading gap cannot be calculated.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners N/A•
English Native +3.5 percentage pointsTrend up

Math Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 9.1 points in math. It widened over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income 0.0 percentage points•
Non-Low-Income +9.3 percentage pointsTrend up

English Learners vs English Native

Results for both language groups are unavailable, so a current math gap cannot be calculated.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners N/A•
English Native +4.0 percentage pointsTrend up

District School Map

Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.

Loading district map...

Hover over a school marker to see details

Schools

Understanding this district

How does Trinity Alps Unified rank in California?

Trinity Alps Unified ranks No. 512 of 977 in reading and No. 467 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.

Are results improving across Trinity Alps Unified’s schools?

Over 2024–2026, reading proficiency rose at 1 of 2 schools with results covering that full period; math rose at 2 of 2.

Compare school trends

How do low-income students in Trinity Alps Unified compare with other districts?

Low-income reading proficiency is 38.0%, compared with 35.1% at a typical California unified district. In math, it is 28.9%, compared with 23.6%.

See student-group results

Which districts should I compare with Trinity Alps Unified?

Unified districts in Trinity County. Peers have the closest enrollment sizes.

2026 proficiency
DistrictMathReading
Trinity Alps UnifiedThis district32.6%43.7%
Mountain Valley Unified39.3%47.2%
Southern Trinity Joint Unified52.6%48.7%
Compare these districts
How we compare low-income results

“Typical” is the median across 339 California unified districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.