Red Bluff Union Elementary
Tehama County school performance
Red Bluff Union Elementary is badly underperforming.
Reading and math results average to the 14th percentile among California school districts.
Only 26.0% of students met California's reading standard, but it is slowly trending up.
Math is weaker: 17.9% of students met California's math standard, but it is trending up slightly.
| Current Reading Proficiency | 26.0% |
| Current Math Proficiency | 17.9% |
| District Reading Rank | 862 / 977 (12th percentile) |
| District Math Rank | 816 / 977 (17th percentile) |
| Student / Teacher Ratio | 21:1 |
| Spend per Student | $20,098 |
| Schools in District | 5 |
| Student Enrollment | 1,809 |
| Low-Income Students | 1,350 (74.6%) |
| English Learners | 237 (13.1%) |
District Website
Great Schools
Niche
Ed-Data
CAASPPTest score trends
Reading rose 2.7 points from last year and rose 3.9 points over the full period. Math rose 0.3 points from last year and rose 2.0 points over the full period.
•Math +2.0 percentage pointsBoard Members
| name | elected | up for re-election |
|---|---|---|
Alexis Jamerson Board Trustee | 2024 | 2026This year! |
Alma Clements Board Trustee | 2024 | 2028 |
Barbara Ramey Board Trustee | 2022 | 2026This year! |
Heidi Kerber Ackley Board Trustee | 2024 | 2028 |
Steven Piffero Board Trustee | 2022 | 2026This year! |
Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance
Reading Proficiency Scores
Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Low-income students trail other students by 9.5 points in reading. It widened slightly over the period shown.
•English Learners vs English Native
10.0% of English learners meet the reading standard, compared with 27.1% of English-only students. The gap held steady as English-learner results rose and English-only results rose.
•Math Proficiency Scores
Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Low-income students trail other students by 5.5 points in math. It narrowed over the period shown.
•
English Learners vs English Native
7.0% of English learners meet the math standard, compared with 18.6% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results fell and English-only results rose.
•District School Map
Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.
Loading district map...
Hover over a school marker to see details
Schools
Understanding this district
How does Red Bluff Union Elementary rank in California?
Red Bluff Union Elementary ranks No. 862 of 977 in reading and No. 816 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.
How much do results vary between Red Bluff Union Elementary’s schools?
Among the 2 schools serving K–6, proficiency ranges from 17.7% to 31.4% in reading and 17.0% to 27.1% in math.
See the district’s schoolsAre results improving across Red Bluff Union Elementary’s schools?
Over 2024–2026, reading proficiency rose at 2 of 5 schools with results covering that full period; math rose at 2 of 5.
Compare school trendsHow do low-income students in Red Bluff Union Elementary compare with other districts?
Low-income reading proficiency is 23.9%, compared with 37.6% at a typical California elementary district. In math, it is 16.7%, compared with 28.2%.
See student-group resultsWhich districts should I compare with Red Bluff Union Elementary?
Elementary districts in Tehama County. Peers have the closest enrollment sizes.
| District | Math | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Red Bluff Union ElementaryThis district | 17.9% | 26.0% |
| Corning Union Elementary | 19.3% | 26.9% |
| Evergreen Union | 46.5% | 57.9% |
How we compare low-income results
“Typical” is the median across 444 California elementary districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.
