Scores updated for 2026!

Evergreen Union

Tehama County school performance

Summary

Evergreen Union is underperforming.

Reading and math results average to the 76th percentile among California school districts.

57.9% of students met California's reading standard, and it is trending up.Trending up

Math is weaker: 46.5% of students met California's math standard, but it is trending up.Trending up

Proficiency Stats
Current Reading Proficiency57.9%
Current Math Proficiency46.5%
District Reading Rank232 / 977 (76th percentile)
District Math Rank230 / 977 (77th percentile)
Other Stats
Student / Teacher Ratio19:1
Spend per Student$15,950
Schools in District4
Student Enrollment1,231
Low-Income Students600 (57.3%)
English Learners57 (5.4%)

Test score trends

2024 - 2026

Reading rose 3.5 points from last year and rose 7.5 points over the full period. Math rose 3.8 points from last year and rose 6.4 points over the full period.

Reading +7.5 percentage pointsTrend up•Math +6.4 percentage pointsTrend up
Changes shown: Reading 2024–2026; Math 2024–2026.

Board Members

nameelectedup for re-election

Michael Mitchell

Board President

20182026This year!

Nora Johnston

Board Member

20242028

Zac Mazzotta

Board Member

20242028

Board website

Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance

Reading Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 12.6 points in reading. It widened over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income +6.7 percentage pointsTrend up•
Non-Low-Income +8.7 percentage pointsTrend up

English Learners vs English Native

17.4% of English learners meet the reading standard, compared with 58.6% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results rose and English-only results rose.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners +4.5 percentage pointsTrend up•
English Native +7.1 percentage pointsTrend up

Math Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 14.1 points in math. It narrowed slightly over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income +6.9 percentage pointsTrend up•
Non-Low-Income +5.2 percentage pointsTrend up

English Learners vs English Native

17.4% of English learners meet the math standard, compared with 47.1% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results rose and English-only results rose.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners +5.6 percentage pointsTrend up•
English Native +5.7 percentage pointsTrend up

District School Map

Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.

Loading district map...

Hover over a school marker to see details

Schools

Understanding this district

How does Evergreen Union rank in California?

Evergreen Union ranks No. 232 of 977 in reading and No. 230 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.

Are results improving across Evergreen Union’s schools?

Over 2024–2026, reading proficiency rose at 4 of 4 schools with results covering that full period; math rose at 4 of 4.

Compare school trends

How do low-income students in Evergreen Union compare with other districts?

Low-income reading proficiency is 53.4%, compared with 37.6% at a typical California elementary district. In math, it is 41.4%, compared with 28.2%.

See student-group results

Which districts should I compare with Evergreen Union?

Elementary districts in Tehama County. Peers have the closest enrollment sizes.

2026 proficiency
DistrictMathReading
Evergreen UnionThis district46.5%57.9%
Red Bluff Union Elementary17.9%26.0%
Antelope Elementary37.4%40.9%
Compare these districts
How we compare low-income results

“Typical” is the median across 444 California elementary districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.