Is this your district? Email the board to prioritize reading!
Email BoardCorning Union Elementary
Tehama County school performance
Corning Union Elementary is badly underperforming.
Reading and math results average to the 16th percentile among California school districts.
Only 26.9% of students met California's reading standard, but it is slowly trending up.
Math is weaker: 19.3% of students met California's math standard, but it is trending up slightly.
| Current Reading Proficiency | 26.9% |
| Current Math Proficiency | 19.3% |
| District Reading Rank | 846 / 977 (13th percentile) |
| District Math Rank | 788 / 977 (19th percentile) |
| Student / Teacher Ratio | 21:1 |
| Spend per Student | $17,845 |
| Schools in District | 5 |
| Student Enrollment | 1,976 |
| Low-Income Students | 1,823 (92.3%) |
| English Learners | 849 (43.0%) |
District Website
Great Schools
Niche
Ed-Data
CAASPPTest score trends
Reading rose 1.9 points from last year and rose 4.7 points over the full period. Math rose 0.2 points from last year and rose 2.2 points over the full period.
•Math +2.2 percentage pointsBoard Members
| name | elected | up for re-election |
|---|---|---|
Helen Pitkin President [email protected] | 1994 | 2026This year! |
Ronda Holland Clerk [email protected] | 2002 | 2026This year! |
Blaine Smith Board Member [email protected] | 2022 | 2026This year! |
Brenda Nelson Board Member [email protected] | 2024 | 2028 |
Jani Greer-Franer Board Member [email protected] | 2020 | 2028 |
Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance
Reading Proficiency Scores
Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Low-income students trail other students by 20.4 points in reading. It widened slightly over the period shown.
•English Learners vs English Native
6.8% of English learners meet the reading standard, compared with 31.9% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results rose and English-only results rose.
•Math Proficiency Scores
Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Low-income students trail other students by 22.9 points in math. It widened over the period shown.
•English Learners vs English Native
5.8% of English learners meet the math standard, compared with 24.1% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results fell and English-only results rose.
•District School Map
Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.
Loading district map...
Hover over a school marker to see details
Schools
Understanding this district
How does Corning Union Elementary rank in California?
Corning Union Elementary ranks No. 846 of 977 in reading and No. 788 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.
How much do results vary between Corning Union Elementary’s schools?
Among the 2 schools serving K–6, proficiency ranges from 23.3% to 28.0% in reading and 15.8% to 25.6% in math.
See the district’s schoolsAre results improving across Corning Union Elementary’s schools?
Over 2024–2026, reading proficiency rose at 5 of 5 schools with results covering that full period; math rose at 3 of 5.
Compare school trendsHow do low-income students in Corning Union Elementary compare with other districts?
Low-income reading proficiency is 25.4%, compared with 37.6% at a typical California elementary district. In math, it is 17.5%, compared with 28.2%.
See student-group resultsWhich districts should I compare with Corning Union Elementary?
Elementary districts in Tehama County. Peers have the closest enrollment sizes.
| District | Math | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Corning Union ElementaryThis district | 19.3% | 26.9% |
| Red Bluff Union Elementary | 17.9% | 26.0% |
| Evergreen Union | 46.5% | 57.9% |
How we compare low-income results
“Typical” is the median across 444 California elementary districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.
