Red Bluff Joint Union High
Tehama County school performance
Red Bluff Joint Union High is underperforming.
Reading and math results average to the 31st percentile among California school districts.
Only 43.1% of students met California's reading standard, but it is trending up slightly.
Math is weaker: 17.7% of students met California's math standard, and it is slowly trending down.
| Current Reading Proficiency | 43.1% |
| Current Math Proficiency | 17.7% |
| District Reading Rank | 525 / 977 (46th percentile) |
| District Math Rank | 818 / 977 (16th percentile) |
| Student / Teacher Ratio | 18:1 |
| Spend per Student | $19,800 |
| Schools in District | 2 |
| Student Enrollment | 1,690 |
| Low-Income Students | 1,290 (76.3%) |
| English Learners | 111 (6.6%) |
Test score trends
Reading fell 6.3 points from last year and rose 0.7 points over the full period. Math fell 4.0 points from last year and fell 4.8 points over the full period.
Board Members
| name | elected | up for re-election |
|---|---|---|
Bullert Board Member | 2022 | 2026This year! |
Forbes Board Member | 2022 | 2026This year! |
Harris Board Member | 2022 | 2026This year! |
Klotz Board Member | 2022 | 2026This year! |
Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance
Reading Proficiency Scores
Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Low-income students trail other students by 11.3 points in reading. It narrowed slightly over the period shown.
English Learners vs English Native
4.5% of English learners meet the reading standard, compared with 44.6% of English-only students. The gap narrowed as English-learner results rose and English-only results fell.
Math Proficiency Scores
Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Low-income students trail other students by 17.5 points in math. It widened over the period shown.
English Learners vs English Native
0.0% of English learners meet the math standard, compared with 20.6% of English-only students. The gap narrowed as English-learner results held steady and English-only results fell.
District School Map
Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.
Loading district map...
Hover over a school marker to see details
Schools
Understanding this district
How does Red Bluff Joint Union High rank in California?
Red Bluff Joint Union High ranks No. 525 of 977 in reading and No. 818 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.
How much do results vary between Red Bluff Joint Union High’s schools?
Among the 2 schools serving 9–12, proficiency ranges from 2.7% to 47.8% in reading and 0.0% to 19.7% in math.
See the district’s schoolsAre results improving across Red Bluff Joint Union High’s schools?
Over 2024–2026, reading proficiency rose at 1 of 2 schools with results covering that full period; math rose at 0 of 2.
Compare school trendsHow do low-income students in Red Bluff Joint Union High compare with other districts?
Low-income reading proficiency is 40.6%, compared with 45.3% at a typical California high district. In math, it is 13.8%, compared with 19.5%.
See student-group resultsWhich districts should I compare with Red Bluff Joint Union High?
High districts in Tehama County. Peers have the closest enrollment sizes.
| District | Math | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Red Bluff Joint Union HighThis district | 17.7% | 43.1% |
| Corning Union High | 5.8% | 29.9% |
How we compare low-income results
“Typical” is the median across 74 California high districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.
CAASPP