Salisbury High (Continuation)
1050 Kimball Road, Red Bluff, CA 96080-2502
Summary
Salisbury High (Continuation) is badly underperforming.
Reading and math results average to the 6th percentile among comparable California schools.
Only 2.7% of students met California's reading standard, and it is trending down.
Math is weaker: 0.0% of students met California's math standard, it is holding steady.
Proficiency stats
| Current Reading Proficiency | 2.7% |
| Current Math Proficiency | 0.0% |
| Reading State Rank | 1,556/1,596 (3rd percentile) |
| Math State Rank | 1,442/1,596 (10th percentile) |
School information
| Student / Teacher Ratio | 11:1 |
| Student enrollment (2024–25) | 104 |
| Low-Income Students | 90 (86.5%) |
| English Learners | 13 (12.5%) |
| Admissions | Open enrollment |
|---|---|
| Charter school | No |
| Magnet school | No |
Test score trends
Reading fell 11.0 points from last year and fell 7.1 points over the full period. Math fell 2.0 points from last year and was unchanged over the full period.
Reading Proficiency Scores
2026 state test results
Race and Ethnicity
Hispanic or Latino and White students have the strongest results.
Distribution of Scores by Grade
2.7% of tested students meet the reading standard in the grade shown. Overall, the school’s reading results rank No. 1,556 of 1,596 among California schools in the same grade-level category.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Results for both income groups are unavailable, so a current reading gap cannot be calculated.
English Learners vs English Native
Results for both language groups are unavailable, so a current reading gap cannot be calculated.
Math Proficiency Scores
2026 state test results
Race and Ethnicity
Hispanic or Latino students have the strongest math results at about 0% proficiency. The other reported groups range from about 0% to 0%.
Distribution of Scores by Grade
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Results for both income groups are unavailable, so a current math gap cannot be calculated.
English Learners vs English Native
Results for both language groups are unavailable, so a current math gap cannot be calculated.
How we compare income gaps
“Typical” means the median gap across 876 schools for reading and 882 for math. The comparison uses 2026 California 9–12 schools with at least 20 tested students in each income group and a reported low-income student population. Each school counts once. Its gap is non-low-income proficiency minus low-income proficiency, including negative gaps. California state test data
Understanding this school
How does Salisbury High (Continuation) compare within the district?
Salisbury High (Continuation) is No. 2 in both reading and math proficiency among the 2 9–12 schools in Red Bluff Joint Union High with 2026 results.
Explore the district’s schoolsHow does Salisbury High (Continuation) rank in California?
Salisbury High (Continuation) ranks No. 1,556 of 1,596 in reading and No. 1,442 of 1,596 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare California schools in the same grade-level category.
How do low-income students at Salisbury High (Continuation) compare within the district?
Low-income students here rank No. 2 in both subjects among 2 9–12 district schools with reportable 2026 results for this group. 3.2% meet the reading standard and 0.0% meet the math standard.
See results by student groupHow does Salisbury High (Continuation) compare with other schools in Red Bluff?
Salisbury High (Continuation) is No. 2 in both reading and math proficiency among the 2 9–12 schools in Red Bluff with 2026 results.
Explore schools in Red BluffHow does Salisbury High (Continuation) compare with other schools in Tehama County?
Salisbury High (Continuation) is No. 4 in reading and tied for No. 4 in math proficiency among the 5 9–12 schools in Tehama County with 2026 results.
Explore schools in Tehama CountyWhich schools should I compare?
Schools serving 9–12 in the same district.
| School | Math | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Salisbury High (Continuation)This school | 0.0% | 2.7% |
| Red Bluff High | 19.7% | 47.8% |
CAASPP