Scores updated for 2026!

Placer Hills Union Elementary

Placer County school performance

Summary

Placer Hills Union Elementary is underperforming.

Reading and math results average to the 72nd percentile among California school districts.

52.8% of students met California's reading standard, and it is trending up slightly.Trending up

Math is weaker: 47.8% of students met California's math standard, and it is trending down slightly.Trending down

Proficiency Stats
Current Reading Proficiency52.8%
Current Math Proficiency47.8%
District Reading Rank319 / 977 (67th percentile)
District Math Rank221 / 977 (78th percentile)
Other Stats
Student / Teacher Ratio20:1
Spend per Student$15,554
Schools in District2
Student Enrollment755
Low-Income Students252 (33.3%)
English Learners14 (1.9%)

Test score trends

2024 - 2026

Reading fell 0.1 points from last year and rose 2.2 points over the full period. Math fell 1.5 points from last year and fell 1.4 points over the full period.

Reading +2.2 percentage pointsTrend up•Math -1.4 percentage pointsTrend down
Changes shown: Reading 2024–2026; Math 2024–2026.

Board Members

nameelectedup for re-election

Ashley Lopez

Board President

[email protected]
20242028

Geoff Anderson

Clerk

[email protected]
20242028

Allison Harvey

Trustee

[email protected]
20242026This year!

David McEntire

Board Member

[email protected]
20222026This year!

Sadie Caldas

Board Member

[email protected]
20222026This year!

Board website

Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance

Reading Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 24.9 points in reading. It narrowed over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income +3.7 percentage pointsTrend up•
Non-Low-Income +0.3 percentage pointsTrend up

English Learners vs English Native

Results for both language groups are unavailable, so a current reading gap cannot be calculated.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners N/A•
English Native +1.4 percentage pointsTrend up

Math Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 33.3 points in math. It widened over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income -10.0 percentage pointsTrend down•
Non-Low-Income +1.1 percentage pointsTrend up

English Learners vs English Native

Results for both language groups are unavailable, so a current math gap cannot be calculated.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners N/A•
English Native -1.8 percentage pointsTrend down

District School Map

Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.

Loading district map...

Hover over a school marker to see details

Schools

Understanding this district

How does Placer Hills Union Elementary rank in California?

Placer Hills Union Elementary ranks No. 319 of 977 in reading and No. 221 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.

Are results improving across Placer Hills Union Elementary’s schools?

Over 2024–2026, reading proficiency rose at 2 of 2 schools with results covering that full period; math rose at 0 of 2.

Compare school trends

How do low-income students in Placer Hills Union Elementary compare with other districts?

Low-income reading proficiency is 35.5%, compared with 37.6% at a typical California elementary district. In math, it is 24.6%, compared with 28.2%.

See student-group results

Which districts should I compare with Placer Hills Union Elementary?

Elementary districts in Placer County. Peers have the closest enrollment sizes.

2026 proficiency
DistrictMathReading
Placer Hills Union ElementaryThis district47.8%52.8%
Ackerman Charter53.1%61.7%
Foresthill Union Elementary29.4%44.6%
Compare these districts
How we compare low-income results

“Typical” is the median across 444 California elementary districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.