Scores updated for 2026!

Orchard Elementary

Santa Clara County school performance

Summary

Orchard Elementary is badly underperforming.

Reading and math results average to the 43rd percentile among California school districts.

Only 39.4% of students met California's reading standard, but it is holding steady.

Math is weaker: 30.1% of students met California's math standard, it is holding steady.

Proficiency Stats
Current Reading Proficiency39.4%
Current Math Proficiency30.1%
District Reading Rank606 / 977 (38th percentile)
District Math Rank511 / 977 (48th percentile)
Other Stats
Student / Teacher Ratio15:1
Spend per Student$21,160
Schools in District1
Student Enrollment740
Low-Income Students371 (50.1%)
English Learners293 (39.5%)

Test score trends

2024 - 2026

Reading rose 0.8 points from last year and fell 0.3 points over the full period. Math rose 3.5 points from last year and rose 0.3 points over the full period.

Reading -0.3 percentage pointsTrend down•Math +0.3 percentage pointsTrend up
Changes shown: Reading 2024–2026; Math 2024–2026.

Board Members

nameelectedup for re-election

Renee Lo

President

20222026This year!

Jeff Tang

Clerk

20222026This year!

Karl Raymond Jacobson

Member

20242028

Katherine Kasolas-Jacobson

Member

20222026This year!

Virginia Varela-Campos

Member

20242028

Board website

Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance

Reading Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 18.9 points in reading. It narrowed slightly over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income +0.5 percentage pointsTrend up•
Non-Low-Income -0.3 percentage pointsTrend down

English Learners vs English Native

10.3% of English learners meet the reading standard, compared with 34.4% of English-only students. The gap narrowed as English-learner results fell and English-only results fell.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners -2.5 percentage pointsTrend down•
English Native -4.3 percentage pointsTrend down

Math Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 21.8 points in math. It widened over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income -3.0 percentage pointsTrend down•
Non-Low-Income +4.7 percentage pointsTrend up

English Learners vs English Native

12.8% of English learners meet the math standard, compared with 24.5% of English-only students. The gap narrowed as English-learner results fell and English-only results fell.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners -0.5 percentage pointsTrend down•
English Native -5.4 percentage pointsTrend down

District School Map

Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.

Loading district map...

Hover over a school marker to see details

Schools

Understanding this district

How does Orchard Elementary rank in California?

Orchard Elementary ranks No. 606 of 977 in reading and No. 511 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.

How do low-income students in Orchard Elementary compare with other districts?

Low-income reading proficiency is 30.6%, compared with 37.6% at a typical California elementary district. In math, it is 20.0%, compared with 28.2%.

See student-group results

Which districts should I compare with Orchard Elementary?

Elementary districts in Santa Clara County. Peers have the closest enrollment sizes.

2026 proficiency
DistrictMathReading
Orchard ElementaryThis district30.1%39.4%
Luther Burbank35.9%37.1%
Loma Prieta Joint Union Elementary73.8%71.7%
Compare these districts
How we compare low-income results

“Typical” is the median across 444 California elementary districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.