Scores updated for 2026!

Loma Prieta Joint Union Elementary

Santa Clara County school performance

Summary

Loma Prieta Joint Union Elementary is a good district.

Reading and math results average to the 94th percentile among California school districts.

71.7% of students met California's reading standard, and it is trending up slightly.Trending up

73.8% of students met California's math standard, which is strong statewide and is trending up.Trending up

Proficiency Stats
Current Reading Proficiency71.7%
Current Math Proficiency73.8%
District Reading Rank83 / 977 (92nd percentile)
District Math Rank43 / 977 (96th percentile)
Other Stats
Student / Teacher Ratio20:1
Spend per Student$20,529
Schools in District2
Student Enrollment423
Low-Income Students54 (12.7%)
English Learners19 (4.5%)

Test score trends

2024 - 2026

Reading fell 3.7 points from last year and rose 1.0 points over the full period. Math fell 1.9 points from last year and rose 4.3 points over the full period.

Reading +1.0 percentage pointsTrend up•Math +4.3 percentage pointsTrend up
Changes shown: Reading 2024–2026; Math 2024–2026.

Board Members

nameelectedup for re-election

Charlotte Boisvert-Khandelwal

School Board President

N/AN/A

Erin Asheghian

School Board Vice President

N/AN/A

Denise Ramón Herrera

School Board Trustee

N/AN/A

Nora Kim

School Board Trustee

N/AN/A

Ron Bourque

School Board Trustee

N/AN/A

Board website

Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance

Reading Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 3.1 points in reading. It narrowed over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income +1.9 percentage pointsTrend up•
Non-Low-Income -0.1 percentage pointsTrend down

English Learners vs English Native

Results for both language groups are unavailable, so a current reading gap cannot be calculated.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners N/A•
English Native +0.3 percentage pointsTrend up

Math Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 5.4 points in math. It narrowed over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income +7.5 percentage pointsTrend up•
Non-Low-Income +1.6 percentage pointsTrend up

English Learners vs English Native

Results for both language groups are unavailable, so a current math gap cannot be calculated.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners N/A•
English Native +4.0 percentage pointsTrend up

District School Map

Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.

Loading district map...

Hover over a school marker to see details

Schools

Understanding this district

How does Loma Prieta Joint Union Elementary rank in California?

Loma Prieta Joint Union Elementary ranks No. 83 of 977 in reading and No. 43 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.

Are results improving across Loma Prieta Joint Union Elementary’s schools?

Over 2024–2026, reading proficiency rose at 1 of 2 schools with results covering that full period; math rose at 2 of 2.

Compare school trends

How do low-income students in Loma Prieta Joint Union Elementary compare with other districts?

Low-income reading proficiency is 69.0%, compared with 37.6% at a typical California elementary district. In math, it is 69.0%, compared with 28.2%.

See student-group results

Which districts should I compare with Loma Prieta Joint Union Elementary?

Elementary districts in Santa Clara County. Peers have the closest enrollment sizes.

2026 proficiency
DistrictMathReading
Loma Prieta Joint Union ElementaryThis district73.8%71.7%
Luther Burbank35.9%37.1%
Orchard Elementary30.1%39.4%
Compare these districts
How we compare low-income results

“Typical” is the median across 444 California elementary districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.