Scores updated for 2026!

Luther Burbank

Santa Clara County school performance

Summary

Luther Burbank is badly underperforming.

Reading and math results average to the 45th percentile among California school districts.

Only 37.1% of students met California's reading standard, but it is holding steady.

Math is weaker: 35.9% of students met California's math standard, but it is trending up.Trending up

Proficiency Stats
Current Reading Proficiency37.1%
Current Math Proficiency35.9%
District Reading Rank662 / 977 (32nd percentile)
District Math Rank407 / 977 (58th percentile)
Other Stats
Student / Teacher Ratio19:1
Spend per Student$22,633
Schools in District1
Student Enrollment426
Low-Income Students346 (81.6%)
English Learners208 (49.1%)

Test score trends

2024 - 2026

Reading rose 5.8 points from last year and was unchanged over the full period. Math rose 5.4 points from last year and rose 7.7 points over the full period.

Reading 0.0 percentage pointsTrend down•Math +7.7 percentage pointsTrend up
Changes shown: Reading 2024–2026; Math 2024–2026.

Board Members

nameelectedup for re-election

Norma Castaneda

Board President

N/AN/A

Elizabeth Fraasch

Trustee

N/AN/A

Jeffrey Buchanan

Trustee

N/AN/A

Jesus Salazar

Trustee

N/AN/A

Miguel Serrano

Trustee

N/AN/A

Board website

Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance

Reading Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 27.7 points in reading. It widened over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income -6.3 percentage pointsTrend down•
Non-Low-Income +29.0 percentage pointsTrend up

English Learners vs English Native

11.9% of English learners meet the reading standard, compared with 50.8% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results fell and English-only results rose.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners -5.9 percentage pointsTrend down•
English Native +9.0 percentage pointsTrend up

Math Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 9.8 points in math. It widened over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income +5.6 percentage pointsTrend up•
Non-Low-Income +16.9 percentage pointsTrend up

English Learners vs English Native

20.0% of English learners meet the math standard, compared with 38.5% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results rose and English-only results rose.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners +3.2 percentage pointsTrend up•
English Native +10.6 percentage pointsTrend up

District School Map

Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.

Loading district map...

Hover over a school marker to see details

Schools

Understanding this district

How does Luther Burbank rank in California?

Luther Burbank ranks No. 662 of 977 in reading and No. 407 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.

How do low-income students in Luther Burbank compare with other districts?

Low-income reading proficiency is 31.8%, compared with 37.6% at a typical California elementary district. In math, it is 34.0%, compared with 28.2%.

See student-group results

Which districts should I compare with Luther Burbank?

Elementary districts in Santa Clara County. Peers have the closest enrollment sizes.

2026 proficiency
DistrictMathReading
Luther BurbankThis district35.9%37.1%
Loma Prieta Joint Union Elementary73.8%71.7%
Orchard Elementary30.1%39.4%
Compare these districts
How we compare low-income results

“Typical” is the median across 444 California elementary districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.