Scores updated for 2026!

Mendocino Unified

Mendocino County school performance

Summary

Mendocino Unified is underperforming.

Reading and math results average to the 71st percentile among California school districts.

54.5% of students met California's reading standard, but it is slowly trending down.Trending down

Math is weaker: 43.3% of students met California's math standard, but it is trending up.Trending up

Proficiency Stats
Current Reading Proficiency54.5%
Current Math Proficiency43.3%
District Reading Rank292 / 977 (70th percentile)
District Math Rank275 / 977 (72nd percentile)
Other Stats
Student / Teacher Ratio13:1
Spend per Student$25,203
Schools in District2
Student Enrollment440
Low-Income Students281 (66.0%)
English Learners16 (3.8%)

Test score trends

2024 - 2026

Reading fell 4.0 points from last year and fell 3.3 points over the full period. Math rose 0.3 points from last year and rose 6.4 points over the full period.

Reading -3.3 percentage pointsTrend down•Math +6.4 percentage pointsTrend up
Changes shown: Reading 2024–2026; Math 2024–2026.

Board Members

nameelectedup for re-election

Michael Schaeffer

Board President

[email protected]
20242028

Mea Bloyd

Board Clerk

[email protected]
N/A2026This year!

Emily Griffen

Board Member

[email protected]
N/A2026This year!

Mark Morton

Board Member

[email protected]
N/A2028

Windspirit Aum

Board Member

[email protected]
N/A2026This year!

Board website

Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance

Reading Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 18.1 points in reading. It narrowed slightly over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income -3.7 percentage pointsTrend down•
Non-Low-Income -3.9 percentage pointsTrend down

English Learners vs English Native

Results for both language groups are unavailable, so a current reading gap cannot be calculated.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners N/A•
English Native -4.0 percentage pointsTrend down

Math Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 22.4 points in math. It widened over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income +4.2 percentage pointsTrend up•
Non-Low-Income +9.9 percentage pointsTrend up

English Learners vs English Native

Results for both language groups are unavailable, so a current math gap cannot be calculated.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners N/A•
English Native +8.6 percentage pointsTrend up

District School Map

Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.

Loading district map...

Hover over a school marker to see details

Schools

Understanding this district

How does Mendocino Unified rank in California?

Mendocino Unified ranks No. 292 of 977 in reading and No. 275 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.

Are results improving across Mendocino Unified’s schools?

Over 2024–2026, reading proficiency rose at 0 of 2 schools with results covering that full period; math rose at 1 of 2.

Compare school trends

How do low-income students in Mendocino Unified compare with other districts?

Low-income reading proficiency is 48.5%, compared with 35.1% at a typical California unified district. In math, it is 36.0%, compared with 23.6%.

See student-group results

Which districts should I compare with Mendocino Unified?

Unified districts in Mendocino County. Peers have the closest enrollment sizes.

2026 proficiency
DistrictMathReading
Mendocino UnifiedThis district43.3%54.5%
Anderson Valley Unified24.2%35.8%
Round Valley Unified7.2%10.4%
Compare these districts
How we compare low-income results

“Typical” is the median across 339 California unified districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.