Scores updated for 2026!

Laytonville Unified

Mendocino County school performance

Summary

Laytonville Unified is badly underperforming.

Reading and math results average to the 14th percentile among California school districts.

Only 24.5% of students met California's reading standard, but it is slowly trending up.Trending up

Math is weaker: 19.0% of students met California's math standard, but it is trending up.Trending up

Proficiency Stats
Current Reading Proficiency24.5%
Current Math Proficiency19.0%
District Reading Rank883 / 977 (10th percentile)
District Math Rank793 / 977 (19th percentile)
Other Stats
Student / Teacher Ratio15:1
Spend per Student$22,372
Schools in District2
Student Enrollment315
Low-Income Students237 (75.2%)
English Learners27 (8.6%)

Test score trends

2024 - 2026

Reading fell 11.8 points from last year and rose 5.0 points over the full period. Math fell 0.1 points from last year and rose 7.5 points over the full period.

Reading +5.0 percentage pointsTrend up•Math +7.5 percentage pointsTrend up
Changes shown: Reading 2024–2026; Math 2024–2026.

Board Members

nameelectedup for re-election

Archived Meetings

Board Members and Terms

N/AN/A

Laytonville Unified School Districtlusd School Board

Board Members and Terms

N/AN/A

School Board

Board Members and Terms

N/AN/A

Board website

Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance

Reading Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 10.8 points in reading. It widened over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income +2.4 percentage pointsTrend up•
Non-Low-Income +10.4 percentage pointsTrend up

English Learners vs English Native

0.0% of English learners meet the reading standard, compared with 28.1% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results fell and English-only results rose.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners -7.1 percentage pointsTrend down•
English Native +7.6 percentage pointsTrend up

Math Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 1.4 points in math. It widened slightly over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income +6.7 percentage pointsTrend up•
Non-Low-Income +9.5 percentage pointsTrend up

English Learners vs English Native

English-learner math proficiency held steady at 0.0%, while English-only results rose. The gap widened.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners 0.0 percentage points•
English Native +7.8 percentage pointsTrend up

District School Map

Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.

Loading district map...

Hover over a school marker to see details

Schools

Understanding this district

How does Laytonville Unified rank in California?

Laytonville Unified ranks No. 883 of 977 in reading and No. 793 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.

Are results improving across Laytonville Unified’s schools?

Over 2024–2026, reading proficiency rose at 2 of 2 schools with results covering that full period; math rose at 2 of 2.

Compare school trends

How do low-income students in Laytonville Unified compare with other districts?

Low-income reading proficiency is 21.2%, compared with 35.1% at a typical California unified district. In math, it is 18.6%, compared with 23.6%.

See student-group results

Which districts should I compare with Laytonville Unified?

Unified districts in Mendocino County. Peers have the closest enrollment sizes.

2026 proficiency
DistrictMathReading
Laytonville UnifiedThis district19.0%24.5%
Potter Valley Community Unified21.4%29.0%
Anderson Valley Unified24.2%35.8%
Compare these districts
How we compare low-income results

“Typical” is the median across 339 California unified districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.