Scores updated for 2026!

Hamilton Unified

Glenn County school performance

Summary

Hamilton Unified is badly underperforming.

Reading and math results average to the 20th percentile among California school districts.

Only 31.9% of students met California's reading standard, but it is trending up.Trending up

Math is weaker: 18.6% of students met California's math standard, but it is trending up slightly.Trending up

Proficiency Stats
Current Reading Proficiency31.9%
Current Math Proficiency18.6%
District Reading Rank769 / 977 (21st percentile)
District Math Rank800 / 977 (18th percentile)
Other Stats
Student / Teacher Ratio17:1
Spend per Student$15,539
Schools in District2
Student Enrollment708
Low-Income Students579 (81.8%)
English Learners199 (28.1%)

Test score trends

2024 - 2026

Reading rose 5.4 points from last year and rose 8.1 points over the full period. Math fell 0.2 points from last year and rose 2.8 points over the full period.

Reading +8.1 percentage pointsTrend up•Math +2.8 percentage pointsTrend up
Changes shown: Reading 2024–2026; Math 2024–2026.

Board Members

nameelectedup for re-election

Hubert "Wendell" Lower

President

N/AN/A

Rod Boone

Clerk

N/AN/A

Gabriel Leal

Board Member

N/AN/A

Ray Odom

Board Member

N/AN/A

Vanessa Reyes Ortiz

Board Member

N/AN/A

Board website

Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance

Reading Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 21.8 points in reading. It narrowed slightly over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income +7.5 percentage pointsTrend up•
Non-Low-Income +5.6 percentage pointsTrend up

English Learners vs English Native

12.5% of English learners meet the reading standard, compared with 29.9% of English-only students. The gap narrowed as English-learner results rose and English-only results rose.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners +2.7 percentage pointsTrend up•
English Native +0.4 percentage pointsTrend up

Math Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 17.5 points in math. It narrowed over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income +2.7 percentage pointsTrend up•
Non-Low-Income -1.4 percentage pointsTrend down

English Learners vs English Native

11.5% of English learners meet the math standard, compared with 16.2% of English-only students. The gap narrowed as English-learner results rose and English-only results fell.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners +0.7 percentage pointsTrend up•
English Native -1.9 percentage pointsTrend down

District School Map

Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.

Loading district map...

Hover over a school marker to see details

Schools

Understanding this district

How does Hamilton Unified rank in California?

Hamilton Unified ranks No. 769 of 977 in reading and No. 800 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.

Are results improving across Hamilton Unified’s schools?

Over 2024–2026, reading proficiency rose at 2 of 2 schools with results covering that full period; math rose at 2 of 2.

Compare school trends

How do low-income students in Hamilton Unified compare with other districts?

Low-income reading proficiency is 29.6%, compared with 35.1% at a typical California unified district. In math, it is 16.8%, compared with 23.6%.

See student-group results

Which districts should I compare with Hamilton Unified?

Unified districts in Glenn County. Peers have the closest enrollment sizes.

2026 proficiency
DistrictMathReading
Hamilton UnifiedThis district18.6%31.9%
Willows Unified20.3%29.4%
Orland Joint Unified14.6%30.4%
Compare these districts
How we compare low-income results

“Typical” is the median across 339 California unified districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.