Scores updated for 2026!

Geyserville Unified

Sonoma County school performance

Summary

Geyserville Unified is badly underperforming.

Reading and math results average to the 30th percentile among California school districts.

Only 32.4% of students met California's reading standard, and it is trending down.Trending down

Math is weaker: 26.5% of students met California's math standard, and it is trending down slightly.Trending down

Proficiency Stats
Current Reading Proficiency32.4%
Current Math Proficiency26.5%
District Reading Rank764 / 977 (22nd percentile)
District Math Rank608 / 977 (38th percentile)
Other Stats
Student / Teacher Ratio13:1
Spend per Student$29,966
Schools in District2
Student Enrollment194
Low-Income Students110 (56.7%)
English Learners50 (25.8%)

Test score trends

2024 - 2026

Reading fell 8.4 points from last year and fell 9.6 points over the full period. Math rose 5.2 points from last year and fell 1.2 points over the full period.

Reading -9.6 percentage pointsTrend down•Math -1.2 percentage pointsTrend down
Changes shown: Reading 2024–2026; Math 2024–2026.

Board Members

nameelectedup for re-election

Robin Doherty

President

N/A2026This year!

Evan Kieser

Clerk of the Board

N/A2028

Jeff Drudge

Board Member

N/A2028

John Riley

Board Member

N/A2026This year!

Board website

Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance

Reading Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 25.7 points in reading. It widened over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income -10.4 percentage pointsTrend down•
Non-Low-Income -5.0 percentage pointsTrend down

English Learners vs English Native

8.6% of English learners meet the reading standard, compared with 44.4% of English-only students. The gap narrowed as English-learner results fell and English-only results fell.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners -7.1 percentage pointsTrend down•
English Native -12.4 percentage pointsTrend down

Math Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 25.2 points in math. It widened over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income -9.2 percentage pointsTrend down•
Non-Low-Income +16.3 percentage pointsTrend up

English Learners vs English Native

17.1% of English learners meet the math standard, compared with 33.3% of English-only students. The gap narrowed as English-learner results rose and English-only results fell.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners +1.5 percentage pointsTrend up•
English Native -2.0 percentage pointsTrend down

District School Map

Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.

Loading district map...

Hover over a school marker to see details

Schools

Understanding this district

How does Geyserville Unified rank in California?

Geyserville Unified ranks No. 764 of 977 in reading and No. 608 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.

Are results improving across Geyserville Unified’s schools?

Over 2024–2026, reading proficiency rose at 1 of 2 schools with results covering that full period; math rose at 1 of 2.

Compare school trends

How do low-income students in Geyserville Unified compare with other districts?

Low-income reading proficiency is 24.3%, compared with 35.1% at a typical California unified district. In math, it is 18.6%, compared with 23.6%.

See student-group results

Which districts should I compare with Geyserville Unified?

Unified districts in Sonoma County. Peers have the closest enrollment sizes.

2026 proficiency
DistrictMathReading
Geyserville UnifiedThis district26.5%32.4%
Healdsburg Unified48.1%55.4%
Cloverdale Unified17.2%26.1%
Compare these districts
How we compare low-income results

“Typical” is the median across 339 California unified districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.