Is this your district? Email the board to prioritize reading!
Email BoardGalt Joint Union Elementary
Sacramento County school performance
Galt Joint Union Elementary is underperforming.
Reading and math results average to the 67th percentile among California school districts.
53.3% of students met California's reading standard, and it is trending up slightly.
Math is weaker: 39.7% of students met California's math standard, but it is trending up slightly.
| Current Reading Proficiency | 53.3% |
| Current Math Proficiency | 39.7% |
| District Reading Rank | 307 / 977 (69th percentile) |
| District Math Rank | 338 / 977 (66th percentile) |
| Student / Teacher Ratio | 20:1 |
| Spend per Student | $16,895 |
| Schools in District | 6 |
| Student Enrollment | 3,441 |
| Low-Income Students | 2,100 (60.8%) |
| English Learners | 544 (15.8%) |
District Website
Great Schools
Niche
Ed-Data
CAASPPTest score trends
Reading rose 0.7 points from last year and rose 2.8 points over the full period. Math was unchanged from last year and rose 2.5 points over the full period.
•Math +2.5 percentage pointsBoard Members
| name | elected | up for re-election |
|---|---|---|
Katherine Harper President [email protected] | 2022 | 2026This year! |
Casey Raboy Vice President [email protected] | 2024 | 2028 |
Annette Kunze Clerk [email protected] | 2022 | 2026This year! |
Matthew A. Ward Member [email protected] | 2024 | 2028 |
Wesley Cagle Member [email protected] | 2022 | 2026This year! |
Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance
Reading Proficiency Scores
Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Low-income students trail other students by 19.7 points in reading. It narrowed over the period shown.
•
English Learners vs English Native
17.4% of English learners meet the reading standard, compared with 56.4% of English-only students. The gap narrowed as English-learner results rose and English-only results rose.
•Math Proficiency Scores
Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Low-income students trail other students by 18.0 points in math. It narrowed slightly over the period shown.
•English Learners vs English Native
15.8% of English learners meet the math standard, compared with 43.4% of English-only students. The gap narrowed as English-learner results rose and English-only results rose.
•District School Map
Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.
Loading district map...
Hover over a school marker to see details
Schools
Understanding this district
How does Galt Joint Union Elementary rank in California?
Galt Joint Union Elementary ranks No. 307 of 977 in reading and No. 338 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.
How much do results vary between Galt Joint Union Elementary’s schools?
Among the 5 schools serving K–6, proficiency ranges from 43.2% to 58.2% in reading and 34.7% to 49.8% in math.
See the district’s schoolsAre results improving across Galt Joint Union Elementary’s schools?
Over 2024–2026, reading proficiency rose at 5 of 6 schools with results covering that full period; math rose at 5 of 6.
Compare school trendsHow do low-income students in Galt Joint Union Elementary compare with other districts?
Low-income reading proficiency is 44.9%, compared with 37.6% at a typical California elementary district. In math, it is 32.1%, compared with 28.2%.
See student-group resultsWhich districts should I compare with Galt Joint Union Elementary?
Elementary districts in Sacramento County. Peers have the closest enrollment sizes.
| District | Math | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Galt Joint Union ElementaryThis district | 39.7% | 53.3% |
| Robla Elementary | 21.3% | 29.0% |
| Arcohe Union Elementary | 34.3% | 39.8% |
How we compare low-income results
“Typical” is the median across 444 California elementary districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.
