Scores updated for 2026!

Ferndale Unified

Humboldt County school performance

Summary

Ferndale Unified is underperforming.

Reading and math results average to the 76th percentile among California school districts.

52.3% of students met California's reading standard, and it is slowly trending up.Trending up

55.6% of students met California's math standard and is slowly trending up.Trending up

Proficiency Stats
Current Reading Proficiency52.3%
Current Math Proficiency55.6%
District Reading Rank326 / 977 (67th percentile)
District Math Rank145 / 977 (85th percentile)
Other Stats
Student / Teacher Ratio15:1
Spend per Student$21,629
Schools in District2
Student Enrollment483
Low-Income Students222 (46.0%)
English Learners19 (3.9%)

Test score trends

2024 - 2026

Reading rose 1.1 points from last year and rose 3.5 points over the full period. Math rose 1.0 points from last year and rose 3.4 points over the full period.

Reading +3.5 percentage pointsTrend up•Math +3.4 percentage pointsTrend up
Changes shown: Reading 2024–2026; Math 2024–2026.

Board Members

nameelectedup for re-election

Colton Brodt

President

[email protected]
20222026This year!

Julie Hagemann

Clerk

[email protected]
N/AN/A

Cliff Titus

Board Member

[email protected]
N/AN/A

Kyla Baxley

Board Member

[email protected]
N/AN/A

Michael Warner

Board Member

[email protected]
20222026This year!

Board website

Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance

Reading Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 26.8 points in reading. It widened over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income -1.9 percentage pointsTrend down•
Non-Low-Income +6.9 percentage pointsTrend up

English Learners vs English Native

Results for both language groups are unavailable, so a current reading gap cannot be calculated.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners N/A•
English Native +3.5 percentage pointsTrend up

Math Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 25.5 points in math. It widened over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income +1.2 percentage pointsTrend up•
Non-Low-Income +4.0 percentage pointsTrend up

English Learners vs English Native

Results for both language groups are unavailable, so a current math gap cannot be calculated.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners N/A•
English Native +4.3 percentage pointsTrend up

District School Map

Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.

Loading district map...

Hover over a school marker to see details

Schools

Understanding this district

How does Ferndale Unified rank in California?

Ferndale Unified ranks No. 326 of 977 in reading and No. 145 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.

Are results improving across Ferndale Unified’s schools?

Over 2024–2026, reading proficiency rose at 2 of 2 schools with results covering that full period; math rose at 2 of 2.

Compare school trends

How do low-income students in Ferndale Unified compare with other districts?

Low-income reading proficiency is 37.4%, compared with 35.1% at a typical California unified district. In math, it is 41.4%, compared with 23.6%.

See student-group results

Which districts should I compare with Ferndale Unified?

Unified districts in Humboldt County. Peers have the closest enrollment sizes.

2026 proficiency
DistrictMathReading
Ferndale UnifiedThis district55.6%52.3%
Southern Humboldt Joint Unified17.9%25.6%
Klamath-Trinity Joint Unified9.0%20.7%
Compare these districts
How we compare low-income results

“Typical” is the median across 339 California unified districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.