Is this your district? Email the board to prioritize reading!
Email BoardKlamath-Trinity Joint Unified
Humboldt County school performance
Klamath-Trinity Joint Unified is badly underperforming.
Reading and math results average to the 6th percentile among California school districts.
Only 20.7% of students met California's reading standard, but it is trending up slightly.
Math is weaker: 9.0% of students met California's math standard, and it is trending down slightly.
| Current Reading Proficiency | 20.7% |
| Current Math Proficiency | 9.0% |
| District Reading Rank | 912 / 977 (7th percentile) |
| District Math Rank | 924 / 977 (5th percentile) |
| Student / Teacher Ratio | 18:1 |
| Spend per Student | $28,776 |
| Schools in District | 4 |
| Student Enrollment | 951 |
| Low-Income Students | 699 (73.5%) |
| English Learners | 2 (0.2%) |
Test score trends
Reading fell 1.3 points from last year and rose 3.0 points over the full period. Math fell 3.3 points from last year and fell 1.0 points over the full period.
Board Members
| name | elected | up for re-election |
|---|---|---|
Lori Hodge Board President (Trustee Area 2) [email protected] | N/A | 2026This year! |
Franklin E. Richards Trustee (Trustee Area 5) [email protected] | N/A | 2028 |
Keduescha Josie Lara Colegrove Trustee (Trustee Area 4) [email protected] | 2024 | 2028 |
Leslie Jackson Trustee (Trustee Area 6) [email protected] | N/A | 2026This year! |
Martha McLaughlin Trustee (Trustee Area 3) [email protected] | 2022 | 2026This year! |
Patti Kelley Trustee (Trustee Area 7) [email protected] | 2024 | 2028 |
Terry Bray Trustee (Trustee Area 1) [email protected] | N/A | 2026This year! |
Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance
Reading Proficiency Scores
Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Low-income students trail other students by 11.3 points in reading. It narrowed over the period shown.
English Learners vs English Native
Results for both language groups are unavailable, so a current reading gap cannot be calculated.
Math Proficiency Scores
Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Low-income students trail other students by 5.2 points in math. It narrowed over the period shown.
English Learners vs English Native
Results for both language groups are unavailable, so a current math gap cannot be calculated.
District School Map
Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.
Loading district map...
Hover over a school marker to see details
Schools
Understanding this district
How does Klamath-Trinity Joint Unified rank in California?
Klamath-Trinity Joint Unified ranks No. 912 of 977 in reading and No. 924 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.
How much do results vary between Klamath-Trinity Joint Unified’s schools?
Among the 3 schools serving K–8, proficiency ranges from 8.3% to 59.2% in reading and 1.4% to 29.8% in math.
See the district’s schoolsAre results improving across Klamath-Trinity Joint Unified’s schools?
Over 2024–2026, reading proficiency rose at 3 of 4 schools with results covering that full period; math rose at 2 of 4.
Compare school trendsHow do low-income students in Klamath-Trinity Joint Unified compare with other districts?
Low-income reading proficiency is 17.5%, compared with 35.1% at a typical California unified district. In math, it is 7.5%, compared with 23.6%.
See student-group resultsWhich districts should I compare with Klamath-Trinity Joint Unified?
Unified districts in Humboldt County. Peers have the closest enrollment sizes.
| District | Math | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Klamath-Trinity Joint UnifiedThis district | 9.0% | 20.7% |
| Southern Humboldt Joint Unified | 17.9% | 25.6% |
| Ferndale Unified | 55.6% | 52.3% |
How we compare low-income results
“Typical” is the median across 339 California unified districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.
CAASPP