Scores updated for 2026!

Yreka Union High

Siskiyou County school performance

Summary

Yreka Union High is underperforming.

Reading and math results average to the 38th percentile among California school districts.

50.0% of students met California's reading standard, but it is slowly trending down.Trending down

Math is weaker: 16.7% of students met California's math standard, and it is slowly trending down.Trending down

Proficiency Stats
Current Reading Proficiency50.0%
Current Math Proficiency16.7%
District Reading Rank375 / 977 (62nd percentile)
District Math Rank838 / 977 (14th percentile)
Other Stats
Student / Teacher Ratio17:1
Spend per Student$21,890
Schools in District2
Student Enrollment650
Low-Income Students379 (58.3%)
English Learners9 (1.4%)

Test score trends

2024 - 2026

Reading rose 0.3 points from last year and fell 3.9 points over the full period. Math fell 2.0 points from last year and fell 4.9 points over the full period.

Reading -3.9 percentage pointsTrend down•Math -4.9 percentage pointsTrend down
Changes shown: Reading 2024–2026; Math 2024–2026.

Board Members

nameelectedup for re-election

Mark Zeigler

Trustee Area 4, President of the Board

N/AN/A

Keith Callison

Trustee Area 4, Clerk of the Board

N/AN/A

Adrienne Caveye

Trustee Area 2

N/AN/A

John Wetzig

Trustee Area 3

N/AN/A

Larry Marks

Trustee Area 4

N/AN/A

Sarah Slabaugh

Trustee Area 4

N/AN/A

Board website

Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance

Reading Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 18.4 points in reading. It widened over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income -5.3 percentage pointsTrend down•
Non-Low-Income +0.9 percentage pointsTrend up

English Learners vs English Native

Results for both language groups are unavailable, so a current reading gap cannot be calculated.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners N/A•
English Native -5.7 percentage pointsTrend down

Math Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 15.6 points in math. It narrowed over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income -1.3 percentage pointsTrend down•
Non-Low-Income -6.6 percentage pointsTrend down

English Learners vs English Native

Results for both language groups are unavailable, so a current math gap cannot be calculated.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners N/A•
English Native -4.7 percentage pointsTrend down

District School Map

Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.

Loading district map...

Hover over a school marker to see details

Schools

Understanding this district

How does Yreka Union High rank in California?

Yreka Union High ranks No. 375 of 977 in reading and No. 838 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.

Are results improving across Yreka Union High’s schools?

Over 2024–2026, reading proficiency rose at 0 of 2 schools with results covering that full period; math rose at 0 of 2.

Compare school trends

How do low-income students in Yreka Union High compare with other districts?

Low-income reading proficiency is 43.0%, compared with 45.3% at a typical California high district. In math, it is 10.8%, compared with 19.5%.

See student-group results

Which districts should I compare with Yreka Union High?

High districts in Siskiyou County. Peers have the closest enrollment sizes.

2026 proficiency
DistrictMathReading
Yreka Union HighThis district16.7%50.0%
Siskiyou Union High22.2%54.6%
Compare these districts
How we compare low-income results

“Typical” is the median across 74 California high districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.