Scores updated for 2026!

Williams Unified

Colusa County school performance

Summary

Williams Unified is badly underperforming.

Reading and math results average to the 12th percentile among California school districts.

Only 29.0% of students met California's reading standard, and it is trending down slightly.Trending down

Math is weaker: 12.4% of students met California's math standard, it is holding steady.

Proficiency Stats
Current Reading Proficiency29.0%
Current Math Proficiency12.4%
District Reading Rank824 / 977 (16th percentile)
District Math Rank896 / 977 (8th percentile)
Other Stats
Student / Teacher Ratio20:1
Spend per Student$16,360
Schools in District3
Student Enrollment1,303
Low-Income Students1,176 (90.3%)
English Learners660 (50.7%)

Test score trends

2024 - 2026

Reading fell 1.6 points from last year and fell 0.8 points over the full period. Math fell 0.9 points from last year and rose 0.2 points over the full period.

Reading -0.8 percentage pointsTrend down•Math +0.2 percentage pointsTrend up
Changes shown: Reading 2024–2026; Math 2024–2026.

Board Members

nameelectedup for re-election

Cesar Perez

President

N/AN/A

Ramiro Solis

Vice President

N/AN/A

Edward Davis

Member

N/AN/A

Heather Covarrubias

Member

N/AN/A

Kathleen Manor

Member

N/AN/A

Board website

Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance

Reading Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 13.0 points in reading. It widened over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income -1.7 percentage pointsTrend down•
Non-Low-Income +3.5 percentage pointsTrend up

English Learners vs English Native

11.0% of English learners meet the reading standard, compared with 32.3% of English-only students. The gap narrowed as English-learner results rose and English-only results fell.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners +3.9 percentage pointsTrend up•
English Native -5.1 percentage pointsTrend down

Math Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 8.5 points in math. It widened over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income -0.4 percentage pointsTrend down•
Non-Low-Income +2.9 percentage pointsTrend up

English Learners vs English Native

7.0% of English learners meet the math standard, compared with 15.6% of English-only students. The gap narrowed as English-learner results rose and English-only results rose.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners +1.8 percentage pointsTrend up•
English Native +1.3 percentage pointsTrend up

District School Map

Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.

Loading district map...

Hover over a school marker to see details

Schools

Understanding this district

How does Williams Unified rank in California?

Williams Unified ranks No. 824 of 977 in reading and No. 896 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.

Are results improving across Williams Unified’s schools?

Over 2024–2026, reading proficiency rose at 2 of 3 schools with results covering that full period; math rose at 2 of 3.

Compare school trends

How do low-income students in Williams Unified compare with other districts?

Low-income reading proficiency is 27.7%, compared with 35.1% at a typical California unified district. In math, it is 11.5%, compared with 23.6%.

See student-group results

Which districts should I compare with Williams Unified?

Unified districts in Colusa County. Peers have the closest enrollment sizes.

2026 proficiency
DistrictMathReading
Williams UnifiedThis district12.4%29.0%
Pierce Joint Unified26.6%36.4%
Colusa Unified31.2%41.0%
Compare these districts
How we compare low-income results

“Typical” is the median across 339 California unified districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.