Is this your district? Email the board to prioritize reading!
Email BoardWeaver Union
Merced County school performance
Weaver Union is badly underperforming.
Reading and math results average to the 38th percentile among California school districts.
Only 36.0% of students met California's reading standard, but it is slowly trending up.
Math is weaker: 29.5% of students met California's math standard, but it is trending up slightly.
| Current Reading Proficiency | 36.0% |
| Current Math Proficiency | 29.5% |
| District Reading Rank | 684 / 977 (30th percentile) |
| District Math Rank | 526 / 977 (46th percentile) |
| Student / Teacher Ratio | 21:1 |
| Spend per Student | $18,334 |
| Schools in District | 3 |
| Student Enrollment | 3,047 |
| Low-Income Students | 2,829 (92.8%) |
| English Learners | 662 (21.7%) |
District Website
Great Schools
Niche
Ed-Data
CAASPPTest score trends
Reading fell 0.9 points from last year and rose 3.3 points over the full period. Math fell 2.9 points from last year and rose 2.2 points over the full period.
•Math +2.2 percentage pointsBoard Members
| name | elected | up for re-election |
|---|---|---|
José A. Muñoz President [email protected] | 2022 | 2026This year! |
Zac Kuykendall Vice President [email protected] | 2024 | 2026This year! |
Louis Smith Board Clerk [email protected] | 2022 | 2026This year! |
Harry E. Hose Trustee [email protected] | 2022 | 2026This year! |
Karen Wallace Trustee [email protected] | 2024 | 2028 |
Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance
Reading Proficiency Scores
Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Low-income students trail other students by 2.4 points in reading. It narrowed slightly over the period shown.
•English Learners vs English Native
11.8% of English learners meet the reading standard, compared with 37.8% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results fell and English-only results rose.
•Math Proficiency Scores
Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Low-income students trail other students by 4.0 points in math. It widened over the period shown.
•English Learners vs English Native
12.8% of English learners meet the math standard, compared with 30.8% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results rose and English-only results rose.
•District School Map
Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.
Loading district map...
Hover over a school marker to see details
Schools
Understanding this district
How does Weaver Union rank in California?
Weaver Union ranks No. 684 of 977 in reading and No. 526 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.
How much do results vary between Weaver Union’s schools?
Among the 2 schools serving K–5, proficiency ranges from 37.3% to 39.7% in reading and 32.0% to 33.8% in math.
See the district’s schoolsAre results improving across Weaver Union’s schools?
Over 2024–2026, reading proficiency rose at 3 of 3 schools with results covering that full period; math rose at 2 of 3.
Compare school trendsHow do low-income students in Weaver Union compare with other districts?
Low-income reading proficiency is 35.7%, compared with 37.6% at a typical California elementary district. In math, it is 29.1%, compared with 28.2%.
See student-group resultsWhich districts should I compare with Weaver Union?
Elementary districts in Merced County. Peers have the closest enrollment sizes.
| District | Math | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Weaver UnionThis district | 29.5% | 36.0% |
| Livingston Union | 24.5% | 34.0% |
| Atwater Elementary | 32.6% | 42.7% |
How we compare low-income results
“Typical” is the median across 444 California elementary districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.
