Scores updated for 2026!

Valley Home Joint Elementary

Stanislaus County school performance

Summary

Valley Home Joint Elementary is badly underperforming.

Reading and math results average to the 36th percentile among California school districts.

Only 31.0% of students met California's reading standard, but it is trending up slightly.Trending up

32.6% of students met California's math standard, but it is trending up.Trending up

Proficiency Stats
Current Reading Proficiency31.0%
Current Math Proficiency32.6%
District Reading Rank789 / 977 (19th percentile)
District Math Rank469 / 977 (52nd percentile)
Other Stats
Student / Teacher Ratio19:1
Spend per Student$15,040
Schools in District1
Student Enrollment191
Low-Income Students65 (34.0%)
English Learners20 (10.5%)

Test score trends

2024 - 2026

Reading fell 1.5 points from last year and rose 0.5 points over the full period. Math rose 0.8 points from last year and rose 6.0 points over the full period.

Reading +0.5 percentage pointsTrend up•Math +6.0 percentage pointsTrend up
Changes shown: Reading 2024–2026; Math 2024–2026.

Board Members

nameelectedup for re-election

Chris Hempleman

Board President

[email protected]
N/A2028

Megan Kistler

Board Clerk

[email protected]
N/A2026This year!

Brandon Longstreth

Member

[email protected]
N/A2028

Leslie Hunt

Member

[email protected]
N/A2028

Michael Hofmann

Member

[email protected]
N/A2026This year!

Board website

Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance

Reading Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 12.2 points in reading. It widened over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income -4.1 percentage pointsTrend down•
Non-Low-Income +0.6 percentage pointsTrend up

English Learners vs English Native

5.6% of English learners meet the reading standard, compared with 37.9% of English-only students. The gap narrowed as English-learner results rose and English-only results rose.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners +5.6 percentage pointsTrend up•
English Native +4.2 percentage pointsTrend up

Math Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 14.3 points in math. It widened over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income -0.6 percentage pointsTrend down•
Non-Low-Income +7.0 percentage pointsTrend up

English Learners vs English Native

11.1% of English learners meet the math standard, compared with 35.8% of English-only students. The gap narrowed as English-learner results rose and English-only results rose.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners +11.1 percentage pointsTrend up•
English Native +5.4 percentage pointsTrend up

District School Map

Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.

Loading district map...

Hover over a school marker to see details

Schools

Understanding this district

How does Valley Home Joint Elementary rank in California?

Valley Home Joint Elementary ranks No. 789 of 977 in reading and No. 469 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.

How do low-income students in Valley Home Joint Elementary compare with other districts?

Low-income reading proficiency is 22.2%, compared with 37.6% at a typical California elementary district. In math, it is 22.2%, compared with 28.2%.

See student-group results

Which districts should I compare with Valley Home Joint Elementary?

Elementary districts in Stanislaus County. Peers have the closest enrollment sizes.

2026 proficiency
DistrictMathReading
Valley Home Joint ElementaryThis district32.6%31.0%
Shiloh Elementary42.2%36.7%
Roberts Ferry Union Elementary52.7%57.3%
Compare these districts
How we compare low-income results

“Typical” is the median across 444 California elementary districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.