Scores updated for 2026!

Shiloh Elementary

Stanislaus County school performance

Summary

Shiloh Elementary is badly underperforming.

Reading and math results average to the 51st percentile among California school districts.

Only 36.7% of students met California's reading standard, and it is slowly trending down.Trending down

42.2% of students met California's math standard, and it is slowly trending down.Trending down

Proficiency Stats
Current Reading Proficiency36.7%
Current Math Proficiency42.2%
District Reading Rank669 / 977 (32nd percentile)
District Math Rank292 / 977 (70th percentile)
Other Stats
Student / Teacher Ratio18:1
Spend per Student$17,202
Schools in District1
Student Enrollment186
Low-Income Students10 (43.5%)
English Learners5 (21.7%)

Test score trends

2024 - 2026

Reading fell 5.0 points from last year and fell 4.4 points over the full period. Math rose 3.9 points from last year and fell 3.3 points over the full period.

Reading -4.4 percentage pointsTrend down•Math -3.3 percentage pointsTrend down
Changes shown: Reading 2024–2026; Math 2024–2026.

Board Members

nameelectedup for re-election

Larry Inderbitzen

Trustee - Board President; Board Member

[email protected]
N/AN/A

George Avila

Trustee; Board Member

20222026This year!

Nicole Morris

Trustee; Board Member

[email protected]
20222026This year!

Board website

Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance

Reading Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 26.1 points in reading. It widened over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income -11.7 percentage pointsTrend down•
Non-Low-Income +4.9 percentage pointsTrend up

English Learners vs English Native

6.9% of English learners meet the reading standard, compared with 49.2% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results fell and English-only results rose.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners -6.4 percentage pointsTrend down•
English Native +2.2 percentage pointsTrend up

Math Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 9.3 points in math. It narrowed slightly over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income -3.4 percentage pointsTrend down•
Non-Low-Income -4.9 percentage pointsTrend down

English Learners vs English Native

13.8% of English learners meet the math standard, compared with 49.2% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results fell and English-only results rose.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners -22.9 percentage pointsTrend down•
English Native +5.1 percentage pointsTrend up

District School Map

Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.

Loading district map...

Hover over a school marker to see details

Schools

Understanding this district

How does Shiloh Elementary rank in California?

Shiloh Elementary ranks No. 669 of 977 in reading and No. 292 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.

How do low-income students in Shiloh Elementary compare with other districts?

Low-income reading proficiency is 26.1%, compared with 37.6% at a typical California elementary district. In math, it is 38.5%, compared with 28.2%.

See student-group results

Which districts should I compare with Shiloh Elementary?

Elementary districts in Stanislaus County. Peers have the closest enrollment sizes.

2026 proficiency
DistrictMathReading
Shiloh ElementaryThis district42.2%36.7%
Valley Home Joint Elementary32.6%31.0%
Paradise Elementary57.9%58.7%
Compare these districts
How we compare low-income results

“Typical” is the median across 444 California elementary districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.