Scores updated for 2026!

Trona Joint Unified

San Bernardino County school performance

Summary

Trona Joint Unified is badly underperforming.

Reading and math results average to the 9th percentile among California school districts.

Only 11.4% of students met California's reading standard, and it is trending down slightly.Trending down

16.7% of students met California's math standard, but it is trending up.Trending up

Proficiency Stats
Current Reading Proficiency11.4%
Current Math Proficiency16.7%
District Reading Rank951 / 977 (3rd percentile)
District Math Rank837 / 977 (14th percentile)
Other Stats
Student / Teacher Ratio16:1
Spend per Student$36,071
Schools in District2
Student Enrollment258
Low-Income Students199 (77.1%)
English Learners6 (2.3%)

Test score trends

2024 - 2026

Reading fell 8.3 points from last year and fell 2.8 points over the full period. Math fell 2.0 points from last year and rose 5.1 points over the full period.

Reading -2.8 percentage pointsTrend down•Math +5.1 percentage pointsTrend up
Changes shown: Reading 2024–2026; Math 2024–2026.

Board Members

nameelectedup for re-election

Cathy Heseman

School Board President

20222026This year!

Priscilla Benadom

Board Clerk

20222026This year!

Jessica Price

Board Trustee

N/AN/A

Sandy Sprouse

Board Trustee

N/AN/A

Skylar McCullar

Board Trustee

20222026This year!

Board website

Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance

Reading Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 12.4 points in reading. It widened over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income -6.0 percentage pointsTrend down•
Non-Low-Income +4.0 percentage pointsTrend up

English Learners vs English Native

Results for both language groups are unavailable, so a current reading gap cannot be calculated.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners N/A•
English Native -3.7 percentage pointsTrend down

Math Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 8.4 points in math. It widened over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income +2.6 percentage pointsTrend up•
Non-Low-Income +10.5 percentage pointsTrend up

English Learners vs English Native

Results for both language groups are unavailable, so a current math gap cannot be calculated.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners N/A•
English Native +4.4 percentage pointsTrend up

District School Map

Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.

Loading district map...

Hover over a school marker to see details

Schools

Understanding this district

How does Trona Joint Unified rank in California?

Trona Joint Unified ranks No. 951 of 977 in reading and No. 837 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.

Are results improving across Trona Joint Unified’s schools?

Over 2024–2026, reading proficiency rose at 1 of 2 schools with results covering that full period; math rose at 2 of 2.

Compare school trends

How do low-income students in Trona Joint Unified compare with other districts?

Low-income reading proficiency is 7.6%, compared with 35.1% at a typical California unified district. In math, it is 14.1%, compared with 23.6%.

See student-group results

Which districts should I compare with Trona Joint Unified?

Unified districts in San Bernardino County. Peers have the closest enrollment sizes.

2026 proficiency
DistrictMathReading
Trona Joint UnifiedThis district16.7%11.4%
Baker Valley Unified12.3%26.1%
Needles Unified17.6%30.5%
Compare these districts
How we compare low-income results

“Typical” is the median across 339 California unified districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.