Scores updated for 2026!

Summerville Union High

Tuolumne County school performance

Summary

Reading and math results average to the 67th percentile among California school districts.

67.7% of students met California's reading standard, and it is slowly trending up.Trending up

Math is weaker: 29.7% of students met California's math standard, and it is quickly trending down.Trending down

Proficiency Stats
Current Reading Proficiency67.7%
Current Math Proficiency29.7%
District Reading Rank121 / 977 (88th percentile)
District Math Rank521 / 977 (47th percentile)
Other Stats
Student / Teacher Ratio19:1
Spend per Student$19,103
Schools in District3
Student Enrollment1,073
Low-Income Students247 (46.9%)
English Learners3 (0.6%)

Test score trends

2024 - 2026

Reading fell 5.2 points from last year and rose 3.2 points over the full period. Math fell 3.5 points from last year and fell 11.5 points over the full period.

Reading +3.2 percentage pointsTrend up•Math -11.5 percentage pointsTrend down
Changes shown: Reading 2024–2026; Math 2024–2026.

Board Members

nameelectedup for re-election

Randy Richter

Board President

[email protected]
20222026This year!

Chantal Fowler

Board Clerk

[email protected]
20242026This year!

David Atkins

Board Member

[email protected]
20242028

Dennis Spisak

Board Member

[email protected]
20242028

Kurt Bayers

Board Member

[email protected]
20242026This year!

Board website

Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance

Reading Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students are 4.7 points ahead in reading. It narrowed over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income +18.1 percentage pointsTrend up•
Non-Low-Income -10.3 percentage pointsTrend down

English Learners vs English Native

Results for both language groups are unavailable, so a current reading gap cannot be calculated.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners N/A•
English Native +2.4 percentage pointsTrend up

Math Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students are 2.2 points ahead in math. It narrowed over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income -1.0 percentage pointsTrend down•
Non-Low-Income -21.1 percentage pointsTrend down

English Learners vs English Native

Results for both language groups are unavailable, so a current math gap cannot be calculated.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners N/A•
English Native -11.5 percentage pointsTrend down

District School Map

Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.

Loading district map...

Hover over a school marker to see details

Schools

Understanding this district

How does Summerville Union High rank in California?

Summerville Union High ranks No. 121 of 977 in reading and No. 521 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.

Are results improving across Summerville Union High’s schools?

Over 2024–2026, reading proficiency rose at 3 of 3 schools with results covering that full period; math rose at 1 of 3.

Compare school trends

How do low-income students in Summerville Union High compare with other districts?

Low-income reading proficiency is 70.7%, compared with 45.3% at a typical California high district. In math, it is 31.0%, compared with 19.5%.

See student-group results

Which districts should I compare with Summerville Union High?

High districts in Tuolumne County. Peers have the closest enrollment sizes.

2026 proficiency
DistrictMathReading
Summerville Union HighThis district29.7%67.7%
Sonora Union High25.9%55.0%
Compare these districts
How we compare low-income results

“Typical” is the median across 74 California high districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.