Is this your district? Email the board to prioritize reading!
Email BoardStanislaus Union Elementary
Stanislaus County school performance
Stanislaus Union Elementary is badly underperforming.
Reading and math results average to the 40th percentile among California school districts.
Only 37.7% of students met California's reading standard, but it is trending up slightly.
Math is weaker: 29.7% of students met California's math standard, and it is trending down slightly.
| Current Reading Proficiency | 37.7% |
| Current Math Proficiency | 29.7% |
| District Reading Rank | 647 / 977 (34th percentile) |
| District Math Rank | 522 / 977 (47th percentile) |
| Student / Teacher Ratio | 20:1 |
| Spend per Student | $19,887 |
| Schools in District | 6 |
| Student Enrollment | 3,325 |
| Low-Income Students | 2,536 (76.2%) |
| English Learners | 749 (22.5%) |
District Website
Great Schools
Niche
Ed-Data
CAASPPTest score trends
Reading fell 0.6 points from last year and rose 1.3 points over the full period. Math fell 0.6 points from last year and fell 1.9 points over the full period.
•Math -1.9 percentage pointsBoard Members
| name | elected | up for re-election |
|---|---|---|
Michele M. Wolf Clerk [email protected] | 2024 | 2028 |
Gricelda Garcia Board Member [email protected] | N/A | N/A |
Michael Tognotti Board Member [email protected] | N/A | N/A |
Susan S. Elliott Board Member [email protected] | 2024 | 2028 |
Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance
Reading Proficiency Scores
Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Low-income students trail other students by 27.6 points in reading. It widened over the period shown.
•English Learners vs English Native
10.0% of English learners meet the reading standard, compared with 41.9% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results rose and English-only results rose.
•Math Proficiency Scores
Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Low-income students trail other students by 28.1 points in math. It widened over the period shown.
•English Learners vs English Native
6.4% of English learners meet the math standard, compared with 34.2% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results fell and English-only results rose.
•District School Map
Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.
Loading district map...
Hover over a school marker to see details
Schools
Understanding this district
How does Stanislaus Union Elementary rank in California?
Stanislaus Union Elementary ranks No. 647 of 977 in reading and No. 522 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.
How much do results vary between Stanislaus Union Elementary’s schools?
Among the 5 schools serving K–6, proficiency ranges from 18.0% to 56.3% in reading and 12.2% to 54.5% in math.
See the district’s schoolsAre results improving across Stanislaus Union Elementary’s schools?
Over 2024–2026, reading proficiency rose at 4 of 6 schools with results covering that full period; math rose at 2 of 6.
Compare school trendsHow do low-income students in Stanislaus Union Elementary compare with other districts?
Low-income reading proficiency is 31.1%, compared with 37.6% at a typical California elementary district. In math, it is 22.9%, compared with 28.2%.
See student-group resultsWhich districts should I compare with Stanislaus Union Elementary?
Elementary districts in Stanislaus County. Peers have the closest enrollment sizes.
| District | Math | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Stanislaus Union ElementaryThis district | 29.7% | 37.7% |
| Salida Union Elementary | 36.3% | 46.0% |
| Empire Union Elementary | 23.1% | 38.2% |
How we compare low-income results
“Typical” is the median across 444 California elementary districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.
