Is this your district? Email the board to prioritize reading!
Email BoardSnowline Joint Unified
San Bernardino County school performance
Snowline Joint Unified is badly underperforming.
Reading and math results average to the 27th percentile among California school districts.
Only 35.2% of students met California's reading standard, but it is slowly trending up.
Math is weaker: 21.4% of students met California's math standard, it is holding steady.
| Current Reading Proficiency | 35.2% |
| Current Math Proficiency | 21.4% |
| District Reading Rank | 700 / 977 (28th percentile) |
| District Math Rank | 728 / 977 (26th percentile) |
| Student / Teacher Ratio | 21:1 |
| Spend per Student | $17,511 |
| Schools in District | 12 |
| Student Enrollment | 8,074 |
| Low-Income Students | 6,152 (76.1%) |
| English Learners | 1,021 (12.6%) |
District Website
Great Schools
Niche
Ed-Data
CAASPPTest score trends
Reading rose 2.5 points from last year and rose 3.7 points over the full period. Math rose 1.1 points from last year and fell 0.1 points over the full period.
•Math -0.1 percentage points
Board Members
| name | elected | up for re-election |
|---|---|---|
Marcus Hernandez President (Trustee Area #4) [email protected] | N/A | N/A |
Corey Lafever Clerk (Trustee Area #2) [email protected] | 2024 | 2028 |
Christina Behringer Trustee (Trustee Area #1) [email protected] | 2022 | 2026This year! |
Nathan Bristol Board Member [email protected] | N/A | N/A |
Ruth Martinez Board Member [email protected] | N/A | N/A |
Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance
Reading Proficiency Scores
Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Low-income students trail other students by 19.2 points in reading. It widened slightly over the period shown.
•English Learners vs English Native
5.5% of English learners meet the reading standard, compared with 37.6% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results fell and English-only results rose.
•Math Proficiency Scores
Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Low-income students trail other students by 18.5 points in math. It widened slightly over the period shown.
•English Learners vs English Native
3.5% of English learners meet the math standard, compared with 24.4% of English-only students. The gap narrowed as English-learner results rose and English-only results rose.
•District School Map
Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.
Loading district map...
Hover over a school marker to see details
Schools
Understanding this district
How does Snowline Joint Unified rank in California?
Snowline Joint Unified ranks No. 700 of 977 in reading and No. 728 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.
How much do results vary between Snowline Joint Unified’s schools?
Among the 5 schools serving K–5, proficiency ranges from 21.2% to 61.1% in reading and 15.0% to 40.3% in math.
See the district’s schoolsAre results improving across Snowline Joint Unified’s schools?
Over 2024–2026, reading proficiency rose at 10 of 12 schools with results covering that full period; math rose at 6 of 12.
Compare school trendsHow do low-income students in Snowline Joint Unified compare with other districts?
Low-income reading proficiency is 31.0%, compared with 35.1% at a typical California unified district. In math, it is 17.4%, compared with 23.6%.
See student-group resultsWhich districts should I compare with Snowline Joint Unified?
Unified districts in San Bernardino County. Peers have the closest enrollment sizes.
| District | Math | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Snowline Joint UnifiedThis district | 21.4% | 35.2% |
| Morongo Unified | 21.8% | 35.4% |
| Upland Unified | 41.3% | 53.8% |
How we compare low-income results
“Typical” is the median across 339 California unified districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.
