Is this your district? Email the board to prioritize reading!
Email BoardMorongo Unified
San Bernardino County school performance
Morongo Unified is badly underperforming.
Reading and math results average to the 27th percentile among California school districts.
Only 35.4% of students met California's reading standard, but it is holding steady.
Math is weaker: 21.8% of students met California's math standard, it is holding steady.
| Current Reading Proficiency | 35.4% |
| Current Math Proficiency | 21.8% |
| District Reading Rank | 697 / 977 (29th percentile) |
| District Math Rank | 721 / 977 (26th percentile) |
| Student / Teacher Ratio | 19:1 |
| Spend per Student | $20,836 |
| Schools in District | 16 |
| Student Enrollment | 7,225 |
| Low-Income Students | 5,253 (72.7%) |
| English Learners | 236 (3.3%) |
District Website
Great Schools
Niche
Ed-Data
CAASPPTest score trends
Reading fell 1.1 points from last year and fell 0.4 points over the full period. Math fell 1.2 points from last year and was unchanged over the full period.
•Math 0.0 percentage pointsBoard Members
| name | elected | up for re-election |
|---|---|---|
C. Claire Board President [email protected] | 2022 | 2026This year! |
R. Meyers Board Clerk [email protected] | 2022 | 2026This year! |
B. Stoker Board Member [email protected] | 2024 | 2028 |
M. Bond Board Member [email protected] | 2025 | 2026This year! |
P. Wood Board Member [email protected] | 2024 | 2028 |
Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance
Reading Proficiency Scores
Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Low-income students trail other students by 20.5 points in reading. It narrowed as non-low-income results fell, while low-income results were unchanged.
English Learners vs English Native
8.5% of English learners meet the reading standard, compared with 35.9% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results fell and English-only results held steady.
•Math Proficiency Scores
Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Low-income students trail other students by 12.8 points in math. It narrowed slightly over the period shown.
•English Learners vs English Native
7.0% of English learners meet the math standard, compared with 22.2% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results fell and English-only results rose.
•District School Map
Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.
Loading district map...
Hover over a school marker to see details
Schools
Understanding this district
How does Morongo Unified rank in California?
Morongo Unified ranks No. 697 of 977 in reading and No. 721 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.
How much do results vary between Morongo Unified’s schools?
Among the 9 schools serving K–6, proficiency ranges from 30.9% to 60.3% in reading and 20.6% to 54.0% in math.
See the district’s schoolsAre results improving across Morongo Unified’s schools?
Over 2024–2026, reading proficiency rose at 8 of 16 schools with results covering that full period; math rose at 9 of 16.
Compare school trendsHow do low-income students in Morongo Unified compare with other districts?
Low-income reading proficiency is 30.2%, compared with 35.1% at a typical California unified district. In math, it is 18.5%, compared with 23.6%.
See student-group resultsWhich districts should I compare with Morongo Unified?
Unified districts in San Bernardino County. Peers have the closest enrollment sizes.
| District | Math | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Morongo UnifiedThis district | 21.8% | 35.4% |
| Snowline Joint Unified | 21.4% | 35.2% |
| Barstow Unified | 11.4% | 18.2% |
How we compare low-income results
“Typical” is the median across 339 California unified districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.
