Is this your district? Email the board to prioritize reading!
Email BoardSanger Unified
Fresno County school performance
Sanger Unified is underperforming.
Reading and math results average to the 72nd percentile among California school districts.
55.2% of students met California's reading standard, and it is trending up.
Math is weaker: 43.7% of students met California's math standard, but it is trending up.
| Current Reading Proficiency | 55.2% |
| Current Math Proficiency | 43.7% |
| District Reading Rank | 277 / 977 (72nd percentile) |
| District Math Rank | 266 / 977 (73rd percentile) |
| Student / Teacher Ratio | 22:1 |
| Spend per Student | $18,269 |
| Schools in District | 20 |
| Student Enrollment | 13,313 |
| Low-Income Students | 8,575 (70.9%) |
| English Learners | 1,466 (12.1%) |
District Website
Great Schools
Niche
Ed-Data
CAASPPTest score trends
Reading rose 2.2 points from last year and rose 6.5 points over the full period. Math rose 2.9 points from last year and rose 6.2 points over the full period.
•Math +6.2 percentage pointsBoard Members
| name | elected | up for re-election |
|---|---|---|
Peter R. Filippi President (Trustee Area #2) [email protected] | N/A | N/A |
Jesse Solorio Vice President (Trustee Area #2) [email protected] | N/A | N/A |
Celida Garcia Lopez Clerk (Trustee Area #4) [email protected] | 2024 | 2028 |
Jesse Vasquez Trustee (Trustee Area #7) [email protected] | N/A | N/A |
Ranetta Bron Trustee (Trustee Area #1) [email protected] | 2024 | 2028 |
Tang M. Yang Trustee (Trustee Area #3) [email protected] | N/A | N/A |
Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance
Reading Proficiency Scores
Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Low-income students trail other students by 23.6 points in reading. It widened slightly over the period shown.
•English Learners vs English Native
11.4% of English learners meet the reading standard, compared with 59.0% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results fell and English-only results rose.
•Math Proficiency Scores
Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Low-income students trail other students by 20.9 points in math. It held steady over the period shown.
•English Learners vs English Native
13.3% of English learners meet the math standard, compared with 46.9% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results rose and English-only results rose.
•District School Map
Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.
Loading district map...
Hover over a school marker to see details
Schools
Understanding this district
How does Sanger Unified rank in California?
Sanger Unified ranks No. 277 of 977 in reading and No. 266 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.
How much do results vary between Sanger Unified’s schools?
Among the 10 schools serving K–6, proficiency ranges from 31.4% to 66.4% in reading and 23.8% to 59.5% in math.
See the district’s schoolsAre results improving across Sanger Unified’s schools?
Over 2024–2026, reading proficiency rose at 15 of 19 schools with results covering that full period; math rose at 17 of 19.
Compare school trendsHow do low-income students in Sanger Unified compare with other districts?
Low-income reading proficiency is 45.8%, compared with 35.1% at a typical California unified district. In math, it is 35.4%, compared with 23.6%.
See student-group resultsWhich districts should I compare with Sanger Unified?
Unified districts in Fresno County. Peers have the closest enrollment sizes.
| District | Math | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Sanger UnifiedThis district | 43.7% | 55.2% |
| Central Unified | 31.0% | 44.3% |
| Kings Canyon Joint Unified | 45.8% | 57.5% |
How we compare low-income results
“Typical” is the median across 339 California unified districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.
