Is this your district? Email the board to prioritize reading!
Email BoardSan Lorenzo Unified
Alameda County school performance
San Lorenzo Unified is badly underperforming.
Reading and math results average to the 22nd percentile among California school districts.
Only 28.7% of students met California's reading standard, and it is trending down slightly.
Math is weaker: 22.9% of students met California's math standard, but it is trending up slightly.
| Current Reading Proficiency | 28.7% |
| Current Math Proficiency | 22.9% |
| District Reading Rank | 827 / 977 (15th percentile) |
| District Math Rank | 691 / 977 (29th percentile) |
| Student / Teacher Ratio | 20:1 |
| Spend per Student | $21,396 |
| Schools in District | 18 |
| Student Enrollment | 9,025 |
| Low-Income Students | 6,034 (75.8%) |
| English Learners | 2,604 (32.7%) |
District Website
Great Schools
Niche
Ed-Data
CAASPPTest score trends
Reading fell 2.0 points from last year and fell 1.6 points over the full period. Math rose 0.1 points from last year and rose 1.1 points over the full period.
•Math +1.1 percentage pointsBoard Members
| name | elected | up for re-election |
|---|---|---|
Alicia Gonzalez Board Member [email protected] | 2020 | 2028 |
Dorothy Lee Board Member [email protected] | 2024 | 2028 |
Juan Campos Board Member [email protected] | 2018 | 2026This year! |
Kyla Sinegal Board Member [email protected] | 2016 | 2028 |
Samuel Medina Board Member [email protected] | 2017 | 2026This year! |
Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance
Reading Proficiency Scores
Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Low-income students trail other students by 21.4 points in reading. It widened slightly over the period shown.
•English Learners vs English Native
7.4% of English learners meet the reading standard, compared with 31.6% of English-only students. The gap narrowed as English-learner results rose and English-only results fell.
•Math Proficiency Scores
Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Low-income students trail other students by 19.0 points in math. It widened over the period shown.
•English Learners vs English Native
9.5% of English learners meet the math standard, compared with 25.2% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results fell and English-only results rose.
•District School Map
Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.
Loading district map...
Hover over a school marker to see details
Schools
Understanding this district
How does San Lorenzo Unified rank in California?
San Lorenzo Unified ranks No. 827 of 977 in reading and No. 691 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.
How much do results vary between San Lorenzo Unified’s schools?
Among the 9 schools serving K–5, proficiency ranges from 12.0% to 38.9% in reading and 9.1% to 48.3% in math.
See the district’s schoolsAre results improving across San Lorenzo Unified’s schools?
Over 2024–2026, reading proficiency rose at 7 of 18 schools with results covering that full period; math rose at 12 of 18.
Compare school trendsHow do low-income students in San Lorenzo Unified compare with other districts?
Low-income reading proficiency is 19.4%, compared with 35.1% at a typical California unified district. In math, it is 14.6%, compared with 23.6%.
See student-group resultsWhich districts should I compare with San Lorenzo Unified?
Unified districts in Alameda County. Peers have the closest enrollment sizes.
| District | Math | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| San Lorenzo UnifiedThis district | 22.9% | 28.7% |
| Berkeley Unified | 66.5% | 71.7% |
| San Leandro Unified | 29.4% | 42.0% |
How we compare low-income results
“Typical” is the median across 339 California unified districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.
