Is this your district? Email the board to prioritize reading!
Email BoardSan Leandro Unified
Alameda County school performance
San Leandro Unified is underperforming.
Reading and math results average to the 45th percentile among California school districts.
Only 42.0% of students met California's reading standard, but it is slowly trending up.
Math is weaker: 29.4% of students met California's math standard, but it is slowly trending up.
| Current Reading Proficiency | 42.0% |
| Current Math Proficiency | 29.4% |
| District Reading Rank | 554 / 977 (43rd percentile) |
| District Math Rank | 529 / 977 (46th percentile) |
| Student / Teacher Ratio | 20:1 |
| Spend per Student | $19,721 |
| Schools in District | 13 |
| Student Enrollment | 8,834 |
| Low-Income Students | 6,809 (76.8%) |
| English Learners | 2,067 (23.3%) |
District Website
Great Schools
Niche
Ed-Data
CAASPPTest score trends
Reading rose 1.9 points from last year and rose 3.3 points over the full period. Math rose 2.9 points from last year and rose 3.6 points over the full period.
•Math +3.6 percentage pointsBoard Members
| name | elected | up for re-election |
|---|---|---|
Cindy Rocha Trustee, Area 3 [email protected] | N/A | N/A |
Diana J. Prola Trustee, Area 5 [email protected] | N/A | N/A |
Jackie C. Perl Trustee, Area 2 [email protected] | 2022 | 2026This year! |
Leo Sheridan Trustee, Area 4 [email protected] | N/A | N/A |
Natasha Martinez Trustee, Area 6 [email protected] | N/A | N/A |
Peter Oshinski Trustee, At-Large [email protected] | N/A | N/A |
Zachary Borja Trustee, Area 1 [email protected] | N/A | N/A |
Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance
Reading Proficiency Scores
Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Low-income students trail other students by 36.8 points in reading. It widened over the period shown.
•English Learners vs English Native
6.7% of English learners meet the reading standard, compared with 46.0% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results fell and English-only results rose.
•Math Proficiency Scores
Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Low-income students trail other students by 33.4 points in math. It widened over the period shown.
•English Learners vs English Native
8.7% of English learners meet the math standard, compared with 31.6% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results fell and English-only results rose.
•District School Map
Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.
Loading district map...
Hover over a school marker to see details
Schools
Understanding this district
How does San Leandro Unified rank in California?
San Leandro Unified ranks No. 554 of 977 in reading and No. 529 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.
How much do results vary between San Leandro Unified’s schools?
Among the 8 schools serving K–5, proficiency ranges from 17.6% to 62.8% in reading and 13.0% to 57.6% in math.
See the district’s schoolsAre results improving across San Leandro Unified’s schools?
Over 2024–2026, reading proficiency rose at 8 of 12 schools with results covering that full period; math rose at 6 of 12.
Compare school trendsHow do low-income students in San Leandro Unified compare with other districts?
Low-income reading proficiency is 35.6%, compared with 35.1% at a typical California unified district. In math, it is 23.6%, compared with 23.6%.
See student-group resultsWhich districts should I compare with San Leandro Unified?
Unified districts in Alameda County. Peers have the closest enrollment sizes.
| District | Math | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| San Leandro UnifiedThis district | 29.4% | 42.0% |
| San Lorenzo Unified | 22.9% | 28.7% |
| Berkeley Unified | 66.5% | 71.7% |
How we compare low-income results
“Typical” is the median across 339 California unified districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.
