Is this your district? Email the board to prioritize reading!
Email BoardSan Bruno Park Elementary
San Mateo County school performance
San Bruno Park Elementary is underperforming.
Reading and math results average to the 68th percentile among California school districts.
Only 49.7% of students met California's reading standard, but it is slowly trending up.
Math is weaker: 45.7% of students met California's math standard, but it is slowly trending up.
| Current Reading Proficiency | 49.7% |
| Current Math Proficiency | 45.7% |
| District Reading Rank | 378 / 977 (61st percentile) |
| District Math Rank | 242 / 977 (75th percentile) |
| Student / Teacher Ratio | 23:1 |
| Spend per Student | $20,623 |
| Schools in District | 5 |
| Student Enrollment | 2,001 |
| Low-Income Students | 1,085 (54.2%) |
| English Learners | 516 (25.8%) |
District Website
Great Schools
Niche
Ed-Data
CAASPPTest score trends
Reading rose 3.0 points from last year and rose 4.6 points over the full period. Math rose 4.5 points from last year and rose 4.0 points over the full period.
•Math +4.0 percentage pointsBoard Members
| name | elected | up for re-election |
|---|---|---|
Kingsley Ma President [email protected] | 2024 | 2028 |
Raymond Giusti Vice President [email protected] | N/A | 2026This year! |
Caroline Tambe Clerk [email protected] | N/A | 2028 |
Alvin Tang Member at Large [email protected] | N/A | 2026This year! |
Amanda Blanchette Representative [email protected] | N/A | 2026This year! |
Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance
Reading Proficiency Scores
Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Low-income students trail other students by 33.1 points in reading. It widened over the period shown.
•English Learners vs English Native
11.9% of English learners meet the reading standard, compared with 60.1% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results rose and English-only results rose.
•Math Proficiency Scores
Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Low-income students trail other students by 29.1 points in math. It widened slightly over the period shown.
•English Learners vs English Native
11.5% of English learners meet the math standard, compared with 55.9% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results rose and English-only results rose.
•District School Map
Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.
Loading district map...
Hover over a school marker to see details
Schools
Understanding this district
How does San Bruno Park Elementary rank in California?
San Bruno Park Elementary ranks No. 378 of 977 in reading and No. 242 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.
How much do results vary between San Bruno Park Elementary’s schools?
Among the 4 schools serving K–6, proficiency ranges from 25.2% to 68.3% in reading and 22.6% to 68.8% in math.
See the district’s schoolsAre results improving across San Bruno Park Elementary’s schools?
Over 2024–2026, reading proficiency rose at 4 of 5 schools with results covering that full period; math rose at 4 of 5.
Compare school trendsHow do low-income students in San Bruno Park Elementary compare with other districts?
Low-income reading proficiency is 27.6%, compared with 37.6% at a typical California elementary district. In math, it is 26.3%, compared with 28.2%.
See student-group resultsWhich districts should I compare with San Bruno Park Elementary?
Elementary districts in San Mateo County. Peers have the closest enrollment sizes.
| District | Math | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| San Bruno Park ElementaryThis district | 45.7% | 49.7% |
| Millbrae Elementary | 62.1% | 64.6% |
| Ravenswood City Elementary | 10.2% | 12.5% |
How we compare low-income results
“Typical” is the median across 444 California elementary districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.
