Is this your district? Email the board to prioritize reading!
Email BoardRavenswood City Elementary
San Mateo County school performance
Ravenswood City Elementary is badly underperforming.
Reading and math results average to the 5th percentile among California school districts.
Only 12.5% of students met California's reading standard, but it is slowly trending up.
Math is weaker: 10.2% of students met California's math standard, but it is slowly trending up.
| Current Reading Proficiency | 12.5% |
| Current Math Proficiency | 10.2% |
| District Reading Rank | 948 / 977 (3rd percentile) |
| District Math Rank | 915 / 977 (6th percentile) |
| Student / Teacher Ratio | 19:1 |
| Spend per Student | $40,730 |
| Schools in District | 6 |
| Student Enrollment | 2,528 |
| Low-Income Students | 1,282 (89.2%) |
| English Learners | 806 (56.1%) |
District Website
Great Schools
Niche
Ed-Data
CAASPPTest score trends
Reading rose 0.5 points from last year and rose 3.9 points over the full period. Math rose 3.1 points from last year and rose 4.1 points over the full period.
•Math +4.1 percentage pointsBoard Members
| name | elected | up for re-election |
|---|---|---|
Tamara Sobomehin Board President [email protected] | 2022 | 2026This year! |
Mele K. Latu Board Vice President [email protected] | 2022 | 2026This year! |
Jenny Varghese Bloom Board Clerk [email protected] | N/A | 2028 |
Laura Nunez Board Member [email protected] | 2022 | 2026This year! |
Samuel Tavera Board Member [email protected] | N/A | 2028 |
Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance
Reading Proficiency Scores
Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Low-income students trail other students by 6.6 points in reading. It widened slightly over the period shown.
•English Learners vs English Native
3.5% of English learners meet the reading standard, compared with 20.4% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results rose and English-only results rose.
•Math Proficiency Scores
Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Low-income students trail other students by 6.9 points in math. It widened over the period shown.
•English Learners vs English Native
5.2% of English learners meet the math standard, compared with 14.0% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results rose and English-only results rose.
•District School Map
Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.
Loading district map...
Hover over a school marker to see details
Schools
-4.7%Understanding this district
How does Ravenswood City Elementary rank in California?
Ravenswood City Elementary ranks No. 948 of 977 in reading and No. 915 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.
How much do results vary between Ravenswood City Elementary’s schools?
Among the 3 schools serving K–5, proficiency ranges from 6.6% to 18.0% in reading and 4.5% to 16.1% in math.
See the district’s schoolsAre results improving across Ravenswood City Elementary’s schools?
Over 2024–2026, reading proficiency rose at 5 of 6 schools with results covering that full period; math rose at 4 of 6.
Compare school trendsHow do low-income students in Ravenswood City Elementary compare with other districts?
Low-income reading proficiency is 11.6%, compared with 37.6% at a typical California elementary district. In math, it is 9.3%, compared with 28.2%.
See student-group resultsWhich districts should I compare with Ravenswood City Elementary?
Elementary districts in San Mateo County. Peers have the closest enrollment sizes.
| District | Math | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Ravenswood City ElementaryThis district | 10.2% | 12.5% |
| Pacifica | 52.8% | 55.8% |
| Menlo Park City Elementary | 78.1% | 79.6% |
How we compare low-income results
“Typical” is the median across 444 California elementary districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.
