Is this your district? Email the board to prioritize reading!
Email BoardRoseville Joint Union High
Placer County school performance
Reading and math results average to the 80th percentile among California school districts.
65.9% of students met California's reading standard, and it is trending up.
Math is weaker: 44.3% of students met California's math standard, but it is trending up.
| Current Reading Proficiency | 65.9% |
| Current Math Proficiency | 44.3% |
| District Reading Rank | 140 / 977 (86th percentile) |
| District Math Rank | 259 / 977 (74th percentile) |
| Student / Teacher Ratio | 22:1 |
| Spend per Student | $16,923 |
| Schools in District | 10 |
| Student Enrollment | 12,852 |
| Low-Income Students | 4,660 (42.4%) |
| English Learners | 671 (6.1%) |
District Website
Great Schools
Niche
Ed-Data
CAASPPTest score trends
Reading rose 2.1 points from last year and rose 5.3 points over the full period. Math rose 2.7 points from last year and rose 8.3 points over the full period.
•Math +8.3 percentage pointsBoard Members
| name | elected | up for re-election |
|---|---|---|
Heidi J. Hall President [email protected] | 2024 | 2028 |
Marla Franz Vice President [email protected] | 2022 | 2026This year! |
Tiffany Coleman Clerk [email protected] | 2024 | 2028 |
Bill Schuetz Member [email protected] | 2024 | 2028 |
Pete Constant Member [email protected] | N/A | 2026This year! |
Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance
Reading Proficiency Scores
Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Low-income students trail other students by 19.4 points in reading. It widened slightly over the period shown.
•English Learners vs English Native
10.9% of English learners meet the reading standard, compared with 68.1% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results rose and English-only results rose.
•Math Proficiency Scores
Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Low-income students trail other students by 18.8 points in math. It narrowed slightly over the period shown.
•English Learners vs English Native
20.0% of English learners meet the math standard, compared with 44.6% of English-only students. The gap narrowed as English-learner results rose and English-only results rose.
•District School Map
Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.
Loading district map...
Hover over a school marker to see details
Schools
-7.4%Understanding this district
How does Roseville Joint Union High rank in California?
Roseville Joint Union High ranks No. 140 of 977 in reading and No. 259 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.
How much do results vary between Roseville Joint Union High’s schools?
Among the 7 schools serving 9–12, proficiency ranges from 46.7% to 78.9% in reading and 20.6% to 67.4% in math.
See the district’s schoolsAre results improving across Roseville Joint Union High’s schools?
Over 2024–2026, reading proficiency rose at 8 of 10 schools with results covering that full period; math rose at 9 of 10.
Compare school trendsHow do low-income students in Roseville Joint Union High compare with other districts?
Low-income reading proficiency is 55.0%, compared with 45.3% at a typical California high district. In math, it is 33.8%, compared with 19.5%.
See student-group resultsWhich districts should I compare with Roseville Joint Union High?
High districts in Placer County. Peers have the closest enrollment sizes.
| District | Math | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Roseville Joint Union HighThis district | 44.3% | 65.9% |
| Placer Union High | 43.0% | 70.9% |
How we compare low-income results
“Typical” is the median across 74 California high districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.
