Is this your district? Email the board to prioritize reading!
Email BoardRedondo Beach Unified
Los Angeles County school performance
Redondo Beach Unified is a good district.
Reading and math results average to the 93rd percentile among California school districts.
73.0% of students met California's reading standard, but it is trending down slightly.
68.7% of students met California's math standard, and it is trending down slightly.
| Current Reading Proficiency | 73.0% |
| Current Math Proficiency | 68.7% |
| District Reading Rank | 73 / 977 (93rd percentile) |
| District Math Rank | 68 / 977 (93rd percentile) |
| Student / Teacher Ratio | 24:1 |
| Spend per Student | $15,080 |
| Schools in District | 12 |
| Student Enrollment | 9,454 |
| Low-Income Students | 1,597 (16.9%) |
| English Learners | 427 (4.5%) |
District Website
Great Schools
Niche
Ed-Data
CAASPPTest score trends
Reading rose 1.7 points from last year and fell 0.5 points over the full period. Math rose 1.2 points from last year and fell 0.8 points over the full period.
•Math -0.8 percentage pointsBoard Members
| name | elected | up for re-election |
|---|---|---|
Dan Elder Board President [email protected] | 2021 | 2029 |
Byung Cho Board Vice President [email protected] | 2023 | 2027 |
Raymur Flinn Clerk [email protected] | 2019 | 2027 |
Hanh Archer Board Member [email protected] | 2025 | 2029 |
Rachel Silverman Nemeth Board Member [email protected] | 2021 | 2029 |
Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance
Reading Proficiency Scores
Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Low-income students trail other students by 21.1 points in reading. It widened over the period shown.
•
English Learners vs English Native
23.0% of English learners meet the reading standard, compared with 74.5% of English-only students. The gap narrowed as English-learner results rose and English-only results fell.
•Math Proficiency Scores
Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Low-income students trail other students by 25.7 points in math. It widened over the period shown.
•English Learners vs English Native
31.7% of English learners meet the math standard, compared with 69.2% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results fell and English-only results fell.
•District School Map
Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.
Loading district map...
Hover over a school marker to see details
Schools
Understanding this district
How does Redondo Beach Unified rank in California?
Redondo Beach Unified ranks No. 73 of 977 in reading and No. 68 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.
How much do results vary between Redondo Beach Unified’s schools?
Among the 8 schools serving K–5, proficiency ranges from 63.7% to 80.8% in reading and 64.8% to 83.7% in math.
See the district’s schoolsAre results improving across Redondo Beach Unified’s schools?
Over 2024–2026, reading proficiency rose at 6 of 12 schools with results covering that full period; math rose at 5 of 12.
Compare school trendsHow do low-income students in Redondo Beach Unified compare with other districts?
Low-income reading proficiency is 55.6%, compared with 35.1% at a typical California unified district. In math, it is 47.5%, compared with 23.6%.
See student-group resultsWhich districts should I compare with Redondo Beach Unified?
Unified districts in Los Angeles County. Peers have the closest enrollment sizes.
| District | Math | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Redondo Beach UnifiedThis district | 68.7% | 73.0% |
| Bellflower Unified | 30.1% | 46.7% |
| Las Virgenes Unified | 61.0% | 69.8% |
How we compare low-income results
“Typical” is the median across 339 California unified districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.
