Is this your district? Email the board to prioritize reading!
Email BoardPleasanton Unified
Alameda County school performance
Pleasanton Unified is a good district.
Reading and math results average to the 95th percentile among California school districts.
77.9% of students met California's reading standard, and it is holding steady.
74.3% of students met California's math standard, which is strong statewide and is trending up slightly.
| Current Reading Proficiency | 77.9% |
| Current Math Proficiency | 74.3% |
| District Reading Rank | 51 / 977 (95th percentile) |
| District Math Rank | 41 / 977 (96th percentile) |
| Student / Teacher Ratio | 22:1 |
| Spend per Student | $17,357 |
| Schools in District | 16 |
| Student Enrollment | 13,302 |
| Low-Income Students | 1,361 (10.2%) |
| English Learners | 1,184 (8.9%) |
District Website
Great Schools
Niche
Ed-Data
CAASPPTest score trends
Reading fell 0.1 points from last year and rose 0.4 points over the full period. Math was unchanged from last year and rose 0.9 points over the full period.
•Math +0.9 percentage pointsBoard Members
| name | elected | up for re-election |
|---|---|---|
Kelly Mokashi Board President [email protected] | 2020 | 2028 |
Laurie Walker Board Vice President [email protected] | 2022 | 2026This year! |
Charlie Jones Board Member [email protected] | 2024 | 2028 |
Justin Brown Board Member [email protected] | 2022 | 2026This year! |
Mary Jo Carreon Board Member [email protected] | 2020 | 2028 |
Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance
Reading Proficiency Scores
Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Low-income students trail other students by 36.8 points in reading. It widened over the period shown.
•English Learners vs English Native
17.3% of English learners meet the reading standard, compared with 76.3% of English-only students. The gap narrowed as English-learner results rose and English-only results rose.
•Math Proficiency Scores
Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Low-income students trail other students by 40.8 points in math. It widened over the period shown.
•English Learners vs English Native
25.1% of English learners meet the math standard, compared with 71.0% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results rose and English-only results rose.
•District School Map
Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.
Loading district map...
Hover over a school marker to see details
Schools
Understanding this district
How does Pleasanton Unified rank in California?
Pleasanton Unified ranks No. 51 of 977 in reading and No. 41 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.
How much do results vary between Pleasanton Unified’s schools?
Among the 9 schools serving K–5, proficiency ranges from 58.2% to 84.7% in reading and 59.0% to 86.5% in math.
See the district’s schoolsAre results improving across Pleasanton Unified’s schools?
Over 2024–2026, reading proficiency rose at 6 of 14 schools with results covering that full period; math rose at 8 of 14. 1 school has a different reporting period and is excluded.
Compare school trendsHow do low-income students in Pleasanton Unified compare with other districts?
Low-income reading proficiency is 46.6%, compared with 35.1% at a typical California unified district. In math, it is 39.5%, compared with 23.6%.
See student-group resultsWhich districts should I compare with Pleasanton Unified?
Unified districts in Alameda County. Peers have the closest enrollment sizes.
| District | Math | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Pleasanton UnifiedThis district | 74.3% | 77.9% |
| Livermore Valley Joint Unified | 52.2% | 61.2% |
| Dublin Unified | 74.1% | 78.1% |
How we compare low-income results
“Typical” is the median across 339 California unified districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.
