Is this your district? Email the board to prioritize reading!
Email BoardDublin Unified
Alameda County school performance
Dublin Unified is a good district.
Reading and math results average to the 95th percentile among California school districts.
78.1% of students met California's reading standard, but it is trending down slightly.
74.1% of students met California's math standard, which is strong statewide, it is holding steady.
| Current Reading Proficiency | 78.1% |
| Current Math Proficiency | 74.1% |
| District Reading Rank | 50 / 977 (95th percentile) |
| District Math Rank | 42 / 977 (96th percentile) |
| Student / Teacher Ratio | 24:1 |
| Spend per Student | $15,492 |
| Schools in District | 14 |
| Student Enrollment | 12,750 |
| Low-Income Students | 1,928 (15.1%) |
| English Learners | 729 (5.7%) |
District Website
Great Schools
Niche
Ed-Data
CAASPPTest score trends
Reading fell 0.3 points from last year and fell 1.4 points over the full period. Math fell 0.8 points from last year and rose 0.2 points over the full period.
•Math +0.2 percentage points
Board Members
| name | elected | up for re-election |
|---|---|---|
Kristin Speck President [email protected] | Appointed | 2026This year! |
Carolina Martinez Vice President [email protected] | Appointed | 2026This year! |
Dan Cherrier Trustee [email protected] | 2022 | 2026This year! |
Gabi Blackman Trustee [email protected] | 2024 | 2028 |
Kristian Reyes Trustee [email protected] | 2024 | 2028 |
Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance
Reading Proficiency Scores
Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Low-income students trail other students by 21.6 points in reading. It widened over the period shown.
•English Learners vs English Native
20.6% of English learners meet the reading standard, compared with 76.9% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results fell and English-only results fell.
•Math Proficiency Scores
Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Low-income students trail other students by 26.3 points in math. It widened over the period shown.
•English Learners vs English Native
31.7% of English learners meet the math standard, compared with 71.7% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results fell and English-only results rose.
•District School Map
Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.
Loading district map...
Hover over a school marker to see details
Schools
Understanding this district
How does Dublin Unified rank in California?
Dublin Unified ranks No. 50 of 977 in reading and No. 42 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.
How much do results vary between Dublin Unified’s schools?
Among the 7 schools serving K–5, proficiency ranges from 62.0% to 87.2% in reading and 58.6% to 87.8% in math.
See the district’s schoolsAre results improving across Dublin Unified’s schools?
Over 2024–2026, reading proficiency rose at 4 of 13 schools with results covering that full period; math rose at 6 of 13.
Compare school trendsHow do low-income students in Dublin Unified compare with other districts?
Low-income reading proficiency is 60.3%, compared with 35.1% at a typical California unified district. In math, it is 52.5%, compared with 23.6%.
See student-group resultsWhich districts should I compare with Dublin Unified?
Unified districts in Alameda County. Peers have the closest enrollment sizes.
| District | Math | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Dublin UnifiedThis district | 74.1% | 78.1% |
| Livermore Valley Joint Unified | 52.2% | 61.2% |
| Pleasanton Unified | 74.3% | 77.9% |
How we compare low-income results
“Typical” is the median across 339 California unified districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.
