Is this your district? Email the board to prioritize reading!
Email BoardNewman-Crows Landing Unified
Stanislaus County school performance
Newman-Crows Landing Unified is badly underperforming.
Reading and math results average to the 30th percentile among California school districts.
Only 37.8% of students met California's reading standard, but it is slowly trending up.
Math is weaker: 21.7% of students met California's math standard, but it is slowly trending up.
| Current Reading Proficiency | 37.8% |
| Current Math Proficiency | 21.7% |
| District Reading Rank | 642 / 977 (34th percentile) |
| District Math Rank | 724 / 977 (26th percentile) |
| Student / Teacher Ratio | 19:1 |
| Spend per Student | $20,377 |
| Schools in District | 7 |
| Student Enrollment | 3,085 |
| Low-Income Students | 2,104 (68.2%) |
| English Learners | 929 (30.1%) |
District Website
Great Schools
Niche
Ed-Data
CAASPPTest score trends
Reading fell 0.8 points from last year and rose 3.4 points over the full period. Math was unchanged from last year and rose 4.1 points over the full period.
•Math +4.1 percentage pointsBoard Members
| name | elected | up for re-election |
|---|---|---|
Don Cabral President [email protected] | 2022 | 2026This year! |
Frank Rivas Clerk [email protected] | 2022 | 2026This year! |
Derek Wach Member [email protected] | 2024 | 2028 |
Lyzette Gonzalez Member [email protected] | 2024 | 2028 |
Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance
Reading Proficiency Scores
Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Low-income students trail other students by 11.7 points in reading. It widened slightly over the period shown.
•English Learners vs English Native
12.3% of English learners meet the reading standard, compared with 41.0% of English-only students. The gap narrowed as English-learner results rose and English-only results rose.
•Math Proficiency Scores
Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Low-income students trail other students by 10.0 points in math. It widened over the period shown.
•English Learners vs English Native
8.1% of English learners meet the math standard, compared with 24.0% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results rose and English-only results rose.
•District School Map
Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.
Loading district map...
Hover over a school marker to see details
Schools
Understanding this district
How does Newman-Crows Landing Unified rank in California?
Newman-Crows Landing Unified ranks No. 642 of 977 in reading and No. 724 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.
How much do results vary between Newman-Crows Landing Unified’s schools?
Among the 4 schools serving K–5, proficiency ranges from 34.9% to 52.3% in reading and 22.6% to 40.0% in math.
See the district’s schoolsAre results improving across Newman-Crows Landing Unified’s schools?
Over 2024–2026, reading proficiency rose at 6 of 6 schools with results covering that full period; math rose at 6 of 6. 1 school has a different reporting period and is excluded.
Compare school trendsHow do low-income students in Newman-Crows Landing Unified compare with other districts?
Low-income reading proficiency is 33.4%, compared with 35.1% at a typical California unified district. In math, it is 17.9%, compared with 23.6%.
See student-group resultsWhich districts should I compare with Newman-Crows Landing Unified?
Unified districts in Stanislaus County. Peers have the closest enrollment sizes.
| District | Math | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Newman-Crows Landing UnifiedThis district | 21.7% | 37.8% |
| Riverbank Unified | 22.6% | 34.5% |
| Waterford Unified | 25.1% | 36.7% |
How we compare low-income results
“Typical” is the median across 339 California unified districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.
