Scores updated for 2026!

Mt. Shasta Union Elementary

Siskiyou County school performance

Summary

Mt. Shasta Union Elementary is underperforming.

Reading and math results average to the 45th percentile among California school districts.

Only 40.1% of students met California's reading standard, but it is trending up slightly.Trending up

Math is weaker: 31.1% of students met California's math standard, and it is slowly trending down.Trending down

Proficiency Stats
Current Reading Proficiency40.1%
Current Math Proficiency31.1%
District Reading Rank586 / 977 (40th percentile)
District Math Rank496 / 977 (49th percentile)
Other Stats
Student / Teacher Ratio20:1
Spend per Student$16,958
Schools in District2
Student Enrollment469
Low-Income Students175 (37.4%)
English Learners9 (1.9%)

Test score trends

2024 - 2026

Reading rose 5.4 points from last year and rose 0.8 points over the full period. Math fell 3.3 points from last year and fell 3.7 points over the full period.

Reading +0.8 percentage pointsTrend up•Math -3.7 percentage pointsTrend down
Changes shown: Reading 2024–2026; Math 2024–2026.

Board Members

nameelectedup for re-election

Nancy Swift

President

[email protected]
20222026This year!

Jessma Evans

Vice President

[email protected]
20222026This year!

Kerry O'Brien

Clerk

[email protected]
N/AN/A

Carson Harris

Trustee

[email protected]
N/AN/A

Jim Hardy

Trustee

[email protected]
N/AN/A

Board website

Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance

Reading Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 20.7 points in reading. It widened over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income -10.1 percentage pointsTrend down•
Non-Low-Income +5.6 percentage pointsTrend up

English Learners vs English Native

Results for both language groups are unavailable, so a current reading gap cannot be calculated.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners N/A•
English Native +0.6 percentage pointsTrend up

Math Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 12.4 points in math. It widened slightly over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income -6.6 percentage pointsTrend down•
Non-Low-Income -6.1 percentage pointsTrend down

English Learners vs English Native

Results for both language groups are unavailable, so a current math gap cannot be calculated.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners N/A•
English Native -4.4 percentage pointsTrend down

District School Map

Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.

Loading district map...

Hover over a school marker to see details

Schools

Understanding this district

How does Mt. Shasta Union Elementary rank in California?

Mt. Shasta Union Elementary ranks No. 586 of 977 in reading and No. 496 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.

Are results improving across Mt. Shasta Union Elementary’s schools?

Over 2024–2026, reading proficiency rose at 1 of 2 schools with results covering that full period; math rose at 0 of 2.

Compare school trends

How do low-income students in Mt. Shasta Union Elementary compare with other districts?

Low-income reading proficiency is 27.1%, compared with 37.6% at a typical California elementary district. In math, it is 23.4%, compared with 28.2%.

See student-group results

Which districts should I compare with Mt. Shasta Union Elementary?

Elementary districts in Siskiyou County. Peers have the closest enrollment sizes.

2026 proficiency
DistrictMathReading
Mt. Shasta Union ElementaryThis district31.1%40.1%
Weed Union Elementary16.1%22.2%
Yreka Union Elementary22.4%27.2%
Compare these districts
How we compare low-income results

“Typical” is the median across 444 California elementary districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.