Is this your district? Email the board to prioritize reading!
Email BoardMt. Diablo Unified
Contra Costa County school performance
Mt. Diablo Unified is underperforming.
Reading and math results average to the 62nd percentile among California school districts.
Only 48.6% of students met California's reading standard, but it is slowly trending up.
Math is weaker: 39.1% of students met California's math standard, but it is trending up slightly.
| Current Reading Proficiency | 48.6% |
| Current Math Proficiency | 39.1% |
| District Reading Rank | 403 / 977 (59th percentile) |
| District Math Rank | 349 / 977 (64th percentile) |
| Student / Teacher Ratio | 24:1 |
| Spend per Student | $17,002 |
| Schools in District | 49 |
| Student Enrollment | 29,879 |
| Low-Income Students | 15,273 (52.3%) |
| English Learners | 6,092 (20.9%) |
Test score trends
Reading rose 0.5 points from last year and rose 3.1 points over the full period. Math rose 0.4 points from last year and rose 1.8 points over the full period.
Board Members
| name | elected | up for re-election |
|---|---|---|
Debra Mason President [email protected] | 2014 | 2026This year! |
Keisha Nzewi Vice President [email protected] | 2020 | 2028 |
Brian Lawrence Trustee [email protected] | Appointed | 2026This year! |
Linda Mayo Trustee [email protected] | 1997 | 2026This year! |
Thomas Frugal" Mcdougall" Trustee [email protected] | 2024 | 2028 |
Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance
Reading Proficiency Scores
Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Low-income students trail other students by 34.4 points in reading. It widened slightly over the period shown.
English Learners vs English Native
5.8% of English learners meet the reading standard, compared with 59.0% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results rose and English-only results rose.
Math Proficiency Scores
Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Low-income students trail other students by 35.5 points in math. It widened slightly over the period shown.
English Learners vs English Native
7.5% of English learners meet the math standard, compared with 49.2% of English-only students. The gap narrowed as English-learner results rose and English-only results rose.
District School Map
Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.
Loading district map...
Hover over a school marker to see details
Schools
Understanding this district
How does Mt. Diablo Unified rank in California?
Mt. Diablo Unified ranks No. 403 of 977 in reading and No. 349 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.
How much do results vary between Mt. Diablo Unified’s schools?
Among the 29 schools serving K–5, proficiency ranges from 11.9% to 79.4% in reading and 8.1% to 82.2% in math.
See the district’s schoolsAre results improving across Mt. Diablo Unified’s schools?
Over 2024–2026, reading proficiency rose at 31 of 48 schools with results covering that full period; math rose at 27 of 48.
Compare school trendsHow do low-income students in Mt. Diablo Unified compare with other districts?
Low-income reading proficiency is 32.8%, compared with 35.1% at a typical California unified district. In math, it is 22.8%, compared with 23.6%.
See student-group resultsWhich districts should I compare with Mt. Diablo Unified?
Unified districts in Contra Costa County. Peers have the closest enrollment sizes.
| District | Math | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Mt. Diablo UnifiedThis district | 39.1% | 48.6% |
| West Contra Costa Unified | 28.1% | 33.8% |
| San Ramon Valley Unified | 75.1% | 80.7% |
How we compare low-income results
“Typical” is the median across 339 California unified districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.
CAASPP