Is this your district? Email the board to prioritize reading!
Email BoardMiddletown Unified
Lake County school performance
Middletown Unified is underperforming.
Reading and math results average to the 56th percentile among California school districts.
Only 47.4% of students met California's reading standard, but it is trending up.
Math is weaker: 34.8% of students met California's math standard, but it is trending up.
| Current Reading Proficiency | 47.4% |
| Current Math Proficiency | 34.8% |
| District Reading Rank | 434 / 977 (56th percentile) |
| District Math Rank | 431 / 977 (56th percentile) |
| Student / Teacher Ratio | 21:1 |
| Spend per Student | $17,066 |
| Schools in District | 7 |
| Student Enrollment | 1,684 |
| Low-Income Students | 751 (51.7%) |
| English Learners | 116 (8.0%) |
District Website
Great Schools
Niche
Ed-Data
CAASPPTest score trends
Reading rose 0.3 points from last year and rose 5.9 points over the full period. Math rose 0.4 points from last year and rose 5.2 points over the full period.
•Math +5.2 percentage pointsBoard Members
| name | elected | up for re-election |
|---|---|---|
Allison Berlogar Board Member [email protected] | 2022 | 2026This year! |
Annette Lee Board Member [email protected] | 2024 | 2028 |
Chris Ochs Board Member [email protected] | 2022 | 2026This year! |
Patricia Pachie Board Member [email protected] | 2024 | 2026This year! |
Zoi Ann Bracisco Board Member [email protected] | 2024 | 2028 |
Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance
Reading Proficiency Scores
Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Low-income students trail other students by 15.3 points in reading. It narrowed slightly over the period shown.
•English Learners vs English Native
7.8% of English learners meet the reading standard, compared with 49.2% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results rose and English-only results rose.
•Math Proficiency Scores
Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Low-income students trail other students by 6.7 points in math. It narrowed over the period shown.
•English Learners vs English Native
9.8% of English learners meet the math standard, compared with 37.1% of English-only students. The gap held steady as English-learner results rose and English-only results rose.
•District School Map
Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.
Loading district map...
Hover over a school marker to see details
Schools
-2.6%Understanding this district
How does Middletown Unified rank in California?
Middletown Unified ranks No. 434 of 977 in reading and No. 431 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.
How much do results vary between Middletown Unified’s schools?
Among the 3 schools serving K–5, proficiency ranges from 20.6% to 54.4% in reading and 23.3% to 53.0% in math.
See the district’s schoolsAre results improving across Middletown Unified’s schools?
Over 2024–2026, reading proficiency rose at 7 of 7 schools with results covering that full period; math rose at 5 of 7.
Compare school trendsHow do low-income students in Middletown Unified compare with other districts?
Low-income reading proficiency is 41.4%, compared with 35.1% at a typical California unified district. In math, it is 32.2%, compared with 23.6%.
See student-group resultsWhich districts should I compare with Middletown Unified?
Unified districts in Lake County. Peers have the closest enrollment sizes.
| District | Math | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Middletown UnifiedThis district | 34.8% | 47.4% |
| Kelseyville Unified | 14.9% | 25.9% |
| Lakeport Unified | 12.4% | 25.8% |
How we compare low-income results
“Typical” is the median across 339 California unified districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.
