Scores updated for 2026!

Leggett Valley Unified

Mendocino County school performance

Summary

Leggett Valley Unified is underperforming.

Reading and math results average to the 52nd percentile among California school districts.

Only 46.5% of students met California's reading standard, but it is trending up.Trending up

Math is weaker: 31.4% of students met California's math standard, but it is quickly trending up.Trending up

Proficiency Stats
Current Reading Proficiency46.5%
Current Math Proficiency31.4%
District Reading Rank454 / 977 (54th percentile)
District Math Rank492 / 977 (50th percentile)
Other Stats
Student / Teacher Ratio9:1
Spend per Student$34,453
Schools in District2
Student Enrollment111
Low-Income Students89 (80.2%)
English Learners4 (3.6%)

Test score trends

2024 - 2026

Reading fell 7.9 points from last year and rose 6.3 points over the full period. Math fell 2.4 points from last year and rose 10.5 points over the full period.

Reading +6.3 percentage pointsTrend up•Math +10.5 percentage pointsTrend up
Changes shown: Reading 2024–2026; Math 2024–2026.

Board Members

nameelectedup for re-election

J. Roemer

Board Clerk

[email protected]
N/AN/A

J. Parent

Board Member

[email protected]
N/AN/A

M. Kelley

Board Member

[email protected]
N/AN/A

Board website

Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance

Reading Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 13.4 points in reading. It widened over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income +3.2 percentage pointsTrend up•
Non-Low-Income +13.4 percentage pointsTrend up

English Learners vs English Native

Results for both language groups are unavailable, so a current reading gap cannot be calculated.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners N/A•
English Native +6.9 percentage pointsTrend up

Math Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 31.1 points in math. It widened over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income +3.3 percentage pointsTrend up•
Non-Low-Income +24.8 percentage pointsTrend up

English Learners vs English Native

Results for both language groups are unavailable, so a current math gap cannot be calculated.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners N/A•
English Native +9.4 percentage pointsTrend up

District School Map

Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.

Loading district map...

Hover over a school marker to see details

Schools

Understanding this district

How does Leggett Valley Unified rank in California?

Leggett Valley Unified ranks No. 454 of 977 in reading and No. 492 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.

How much do results vary between Leggett Valley Unified’s schools?

Among the 2 schools serving K–8, proficiency ranges from 24.2% to 75.0% in reading and 23.1% to 37.5% in math.

See the district’s schools

Are results improving across Leggett Valley Unified’s schools?

Over 2024–2026, reading proficiency rose at 1 of 2 schools with results covering that full period; math rose at 2 of 2.

Compare school trends

How do low-income students in Leggett Valley Unified compare with other districts?

Low-income reading proficiency is 42.9%, compared with 35.1% at a typical California unified district. In math, it is 22.2%, compared with 23.6%.

See student-group results

Which districts should I compare with Leggett Valley Unified?

Unified districts in Mendocino County. Peers have the closest enrollment sizes.

2026 proficiency
DistrictMathReading
Leggett Valley UnifiedThis district31.4%46.5%
Potter Valley Community Unified21.4%29.0%
Laytonville Unified19.0%24.5%
Compare these districts
How we compare low-income results

“Typical” is the median across 339 California unified districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.