Scores updated for 2026!

General Shafter Elementary

Kern County school performance

Summary

General Shafter Elementary is underperforming.

Reading and math results average to the 50th percentile among California school districts.

Only 44.8% of students met California's reading standard, but it is slowly trending up.Trending up

Math is weaker: 31.6% of students met California's math standard, and it is trending down slightly.Trending down

Proficiency Stats
Current Reading Proficiency44.8%
Current Math Proficiency31.6%
District Reading Rank492 / 977 (50th percentile)
District Math Rank487 / 977 (50th percentile)
Other Stats
Student / Teacher Ratio17:1
Spend per Student$19,323
Schools in District1
Student Enrollment169
Low-Income Students150 (89.3%)
English Learners44 (26.2%)

Test score trends

2024 - 2026

Reading rose 0.9 points from last year and rose 3.3 points over the full period. Math fell 14.3 points from last year and fell 2.6 points over the full period.

Reading +3.3 percentage pointsTrend up•Math -2.6 percentage pointsTrend down
Changes shown: Reading 2024–2026; Math 2024–2026.

Board Members

nameelectedup for re-election

Anthony Buoni

Board Member

[email protected]
N/A2028

Leane Melo

Board Member

[email protected]
N/A2026This year!

Matthew Woodfin

Board Member

[email protected]
N/A2028

Board website

Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance

Reading Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 8.1 points in reading. It widened over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income +0.9 percentage pointsTrend up•
Non-Low-Income +3.9 percentage pointsTrend up

English Learners vs English Native

8.0% of English learners meet the reading standard, compared with 47.7% of English-only students. The gap narrowed as English-learner results rose and English-only results fell.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners +3.8 percentage pointsTrend up•
English Native -2.3 percentage pointsTrend down

Math Proficiency Scores

Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.

Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income

Low-income students trail other students by 10.1 points in math. It narrowed over the period shown.

Low-Income
Non-Low-Income
Low-Income -4.1 percentage pointsTrend down•
Non-Low-Income -11.9 percentage pointsTrend down

English Learners vs English Native

3.9% of English learners meet the math standard, compared with 36.9% of English-only students. The gap narrowed as English-learner results held steady and English-only results fell.

English Learners
English Native
English Learners 0.0 percentage points•
English Native -7.7 percentage pointsTrend down

District School Map

Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.

Loading district map...

Hover over a school marker to see details

Schools

Understanding this district

How does General Shafter Elementary rank in California?

General Shafter Elementary ranks No. 492 of 977 in reading and No. 487 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.

How do low-income students in General Shafter Elementary compare with other districts?

Low-income reading proficiency is 41.9%, compared with 37.6% at a typical California elementary district. In math, it is 28.0%, compared with 28.2%.

See student-group results

Which districts should I compare with General Shafter Elementary?

Elementary districts in Kern County. Peers have the closest enrollment sizes.

2026 proficiency
DistrictMathReading
General Shafter ElementaryThis district31.6%44.8%
Pond Union Elementary22.7%37.3%
Elk Hills Elementary28.9%28.9%
Compare these districts
How we compare low-income results

“Typical” is the median across 444 California elementary districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.