Is this your district? Email the board to prioritize reading!
Email BoardFranklin-McKinley Elementary
Santa Clara County school performance
Franklin-McKinley Elementary is badly underperforming.
Reading and math results average to the 38th percentile among California school districts.
Only 35.7% of students met California's reading standard, but it is holding steady.
Math is weaker: 29.7% of students met California's math standard, but it is trending up slightly.
| Current Reading Proficiency | 35.7% |
| Current Math Proficiency | 29.7% |
| District Reading Rank | 690 / 977 (29th percentile) |
| District Math Rank | 519 / 977 (47th percentile) |
| Student / Teacher Ratio | 22:1 |
| Spend per Student | $25,399 |
| Schools in District | 18 |
| Student Enrollment | 7,712 |
| Low-Income Students | 4,601 (81.2%) |
| English Learners | 2,477 (43.7%) |
District Website
Great Schools
Niche
Ed-Data
CAASPPTest score trends
Reading fell 0.2 points from last year and rose 0.4 points over the full period. Math rose 1.2 points from last year and rose 2.1 points over the full period.
•Math +2.1 percentage pointsBoard Members
| name | elected | up for re-election |
|---|---|---|
Hong Ha Hoang President [email protected] | 2024 | 2028 |
Steven Sanchez Vice President [email protected] | 2022 | 2026This year! |
Rudy Rodriguez Clerk [email protected] | 2010 | 2026This year! |
George Sanchez Member [email protected] | 1993 | 2028 |
Marc Cooper Member [email protected] | 2022 | 2026This year! |
Expand for details on low-income and english learner performance
Reading Proficiency Scores
Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Low-income students trail other students by 20.8 points in reading. It narrowed slightly over the period shown.
•English Learners vs English Native
6.4% of English learners meet the reading standard, compared with 36.6% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results fell and English-only results rose.
•Math Proficiency Scores
Comparison of low-income and English learner groups using district-level CAASPP proficiency data.
Low-Income vs Non-Low-Income
Low-income students trail other students by 19.4 points in math. It widened over the period shown.
•English Learners vs English Native
10.4% of English learners meet the math standard, compared with 28.1% of English-only students. The gap widened as English-learner results rose and English-only results rose.
•District School Map
Schools in this district, color-coded by reading proficiency.
Loading district map...
Hover over a school marker to see details
Schools
Understanding this district
How does Franklin-McKinley Elementary rank in California?
Franklin-McKinley Elementary ranks No. 690 of 977 in reading and No. 519 of 977 in math for 2026. These proficiency rankings compare districts across all district types.
How much do results vary between Franklin-McKinley Elementary’s schools?
Among the 5 schools serving K–6, proficiency ranges from 23.6% to 33.1% in reading and 17.9% to 31.3% in math.
See the district’s schoolsAre results improving across Franklin-McKinley Elementary’s schools?
Over 2024–2026, reading proficiency rose at 10 of 18 schools with results covering that full period; math rose at 12 of 18.
Compare school trendsHow do low-income students in Franklin-McKinley Elementary compare with other districts?
Low-income reading proficiency is 33.3%, compared with 37.6% at a typical California elementary district. In math, it is 27.5%, compared with 28.2%.
See student-group resultsWhich districts should I compare with Franklin-McKinley Elementary?
Elementary districts in Santa Clara County. Peers have the closest enrollment sizes.
| District | Math | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| Franklin-McKinley ElementaryThis district | 29.7% | 35.7% |
| Evergreen Elementary | 59.4% | 64.0% |
| Oak Grove Elementary | 44.2% | 48.0% |
How we compare low-income results
“Typical” is the median across 444 California elementary districts with 2026 results, a reported low-income population, and at least 20 low-income tested students in each subject. Each district counts once. This compares proficiency for low-income students, rather than the gap between income groups.
